2 Search Results for "Brada, Premek"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/DARTS.3.2.6
Contracts in the Wild: A Study of Java Programs (Artifact)

Authors: Jens Dietrich, David J. Pearce, Kamil Jezek, and Premek Brada

Published in: DARTS, Volume 3, Issue 2, Special Issue of the 31st European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2017)

Abstract
This artefact contains a dataset of open-source programs obtained from the Maven Central Repository and scripts that first extract contracts from these programs and then perform several analyses on the contracts extracted. The extraction and analysis is fully automated and directly produces the tables presented in the accompanying paper. The results show how contracts are used in real-world program, and how their usage changes between versions and within inheritance hierarchies.
Cite as

Jens Dietrich, David J. Pearce, Kamil Jezek, and Premek Brada. Contracts in the Wild: A Study of Java Programs (Artifact). In Special Issue of the 31st European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2017). Dagstuhl Artifacts Series (DARTS), Volume 3, Issue 2, pp. 6:1-6:4, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{dietrich_et_al:DARTS.3.2.6,
  author =	{Dietrich, Jens and Pearce, David J. and Jezek, Kamil and Brada, Premek},
  title =	{{Contracts in the Wild: A Study of Java Programs (Artifact)}},
  pages =	{6:1--6:4},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Artifacts Series},
  ISSN =	{2509-8195},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{3},
  number =	{2},
  editor =	{Dietrich, Jens and Pearce, David J. and Jezek, Kamil and Brada, Premek},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DARTS.3.2.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-72871},
  doi =		{10.4230/DARTS.3.2.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: verification, design-by-contract, assertions, preconditions, postconditions, runtime checking, java, input validation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2017.9
Contracts in the Wild: A Study of Java Programs

Authors: Jens Dietrich, David J. Pearce, Kamil Jezek, and Premek Brada

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 74, 31st European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2017)

Abstract
The use of formal contracts has long been advocated as an approach to develop programs that are provably correct. However, the reality is that adoption of contracts has been slow in practice. Despite this, the adoption of lightweight contracts — typically utilising runtime checking — has progressed. In the case of Java, built-in features of the language (e.g. assertions and exceptions) can be used for this. Furthermore, a number of libraries which facilitate contract checking have arisen. In this paper, we catalogue 25 techniques and tools for lightweight contract checking in Java, and present the results of an empirical study looking at a dataset extracted from the 200 most popular projects found on Maven Central, constituting roughly 351,034 KLOC. We examine (1) the extent to which contracts are used and (2) what kind of contracts are used. We then investigate how contracts are used to safeguard code, and study problems in the context of two types of substitutability that can be guarded by contracts: (3) unsafe evolution of APIs that may break client programs and (4) violations of Liskovs Substitution Principle (LSP) when methods are overridden. We find that: (1) a wide range of techniques and constructs are used to represent contracts, and often the same program uses different techniques at the same time; (2) overall, contracts are used less than expected, with significant differences between programs; (3) projects that use contracts continue to do so, and expand the use of contracts as they grow and evolve; and, (4) there are cases where the use of contracts points to unsafe subtyping (violations of Liskov's Substitution Principle) and unsafe evolution.
Cite as

Jens Dietrich, David J. Pearce, Kamil Jezek, and Premek Brada. Contracts in the Wild: A Study of Java Programs. In 31st European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 74, pp. 9:1-9:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dietrich_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2017.9,
  author =	{Dietrich, Jens and Pearce, David J. and Jezek, Kamil and Brada, Premek},
  title =	{{Contracts in the Wild: A Study of Java Programs}},
  booktitle =	{31st European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2017)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-035-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{74},
  editor =	{M\"{u}ller, Peter},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2017.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-72590},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2017.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: verification, design-by-contract, assertions, preconditions, postconditions, runtime checking, java, input validation}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Brada, Premek
  • 2 Dietrich, Jens
  • 2 Jezek, Kamil
  • 2 Pearce, David J.

  • Refine by Classification

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 assertions
  • 2 design-by-contract
  • 2 input validation
  • 2 java
  • 2 postconditions
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 2 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 2 2017

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact