4 Search Results for "Korwar, Arpita"


Document
Polynomial Identity Testing via Evaluation of Rational Functions

Authors: Dieter van Melkebeek and Andrew Morgan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 215, 13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022)


Abstract
We introduce a hitting set generator for Polynomial Identity Testing based on evaluations of low-degree univariate rational functions at abscissas associated with the variables. In spite of the univariate nature, we establish an equivalence up to rescaling with a generator introduced by Shpilka and Volkovich, which has a similar structure but uses multivariate polynomials in the abscissas. We study the power of the generator by characterizing its vanishing ideal, i.e., the set of polynomials that it fails to hit. Capitalizing on the univariate nature, we develop a small collection of polynomials that jointly produce the vanishing ideal. As corollaries, we obtain tight bounds on the minimum degree, sparseness, and partition size of set-multi-linearity in the vanishing ideal. Inspired by an alternating algebra representation, we develop a structured deterministic membership test for the vanishing ideal. As a proof of concept we rederive known derandomization results based on the generator by Shpilka and Volkovich, and present a new application for read-once oblivious arithmetic branching programs that provably transcends the usual combinatorial techniques.

Cite as

Dieter van Melkebeek and Andrew Morgan. Polynomial Identity Testing via Evaluation of Rational Functions. In 13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 215, pp. 119:1-119:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{vanmelkebeek_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.119,
  author =	{van Melkebeek, Dieter and Morgan, Andrew},
  title =	{{Polynomial Identity Testing via Evaluation of Rational Functions}},
  booktitle =	{13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022)},
  pages =	{119:1--119:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-217-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{215},
  editor =	{Braverman, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.119},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-157158},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.119},
  annote =	{Keywords: Derandomization, Gr\"{o}bner Basis, Lower Bounds, Polynomial Identity Testing}
}
Document
Factorization of Polynomials Given By Arithmetic Branching Programs

Authors: Amit Sinhababu and Thomas Thierauf

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 169, 35th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2020)


Abstract
Given a multivariate polynomial computed by an arithmetic branching program (ABP) of size s, we show that all its factors can be computed by arithmetic branching programs of size poly(s). Kaltofen gave a similar result for polynomials computed by arithmetic circuits. The previously known best upper bound for ABP-factors was poly(s^(log s)).

Cite as

Amit Sinhababu and Thomas Thierauf. Factorization of Polynomials Given By Arithmetic Branching Programs. In 35th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 169, pp. 33:1-33:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{sinhababu_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2020.33,
  author =	{Sinhababu, Amit and Thierauf, Thomas},
  title =	{{Factorization of Polynomials Given By Arithmetic Branching Programs}},
  booktitle =	{35th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2020)},
  pages =	{33:1--33:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-156-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{169},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2020.33},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-125854},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2020.33},
  annote =	{Keywords: Arithmetic Branching Program, Multivariate Polynomial Factorization, Hensel Lifting, Newton Iteration, Hardness vs Randomness}
}
Document
Identity Testing for Constant-Width, and Commutative, Read-Once Oblivious ABPs

Authors: Rohit Gurjar, Arpita Korwar, and Nitin Saxena

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 50, 31st Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC 2016)


Abstract
We give improved hitting-sets for two special cases of Read-once Oblivious Arithmetic Branching Programs (ROABP). First is the case of an ROABP with known variable order. The best hitting-set known for this case had cost (nw)^{O(log(n))}, where n is the number of variables and w is the width of the ROABP. Even for a constant-width ROABP, nothing better than a quasi-polynomial bound was known. We improve the hitting-set complexity for the known-order case to n^{O(log(w))}. In particular, this gives the first polynomial time hitting-set for constant-width ROABP (known-order). However, our hitting-set works only over those fields whose characteristic is zero or large enough. To construct the hitting-set, we use the concept of the rank of partial derivative matrix. Unlike previous approaches whose starting point is a monomial map, we use a polynomial map directly. The second case we consider is that of commutative ROABP. The best known hitting-set for this case had cost d^{O(log(w))}(nw)^{O(log(log(w)))}, where d is the individual degree. We improve this hitting-set complexity to (ndw)^{O(log(log(w)))}. We get this by achieving rank concentration more efficiently.

Cite as

Rohit Gurjar, Arpita Korwar, and Nitin Saxena. Identity Testing for Constant-Width, and Commutative, Read-Once Oblivious ABPs. In 31st Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 50, pp. 29:1-29:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gurjar_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2016.29,
  author =	{Gurjar, Rohit and Korwar, Arpita and Saxena, Nitin},
  title =	{{Identity Testing for Constant-Width, and Commutative, Read-Once Oblivious ABPs}},
  booktitle =	{31st Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC 2016)},
  pages =	{29:1--29:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-008-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{50},
  editor =	{Raz, Ran},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2016.29},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-58438},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2016.29},
  annote =	{Keywords: PIT, hitting-set, constant-width ROABPs, commutative ROABPs}
}
Document
Deterministic Identity Testing for Sum of Read-once Oblivious Arithmetic Branching Programs

Authors: Rohit Gurjar, Arpita Korwar, Nitin Saxena, and Thomas Thierauf

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 33, 30th Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC 2015)


Abstract
A read-once oblivious arithmetic branching program (ROABP) is an arithmetic branching program (ABP) where each variable occurs in at most one layer. We give the first polynomial time whitebox identity test for a polynomial computed by a sum of constantly many ROABPs. We also give a corresponding blackbox algorithm with quasi-polynomial time complexity n^(O(log(n))). In both the cases, our time complexity is double exponential in the number of ROABPs. ROABPs are a generalization of set-multilinear depth-3 circuits. The prior results for the sum of constantly many set-multilinear depth-3 circuits were only slightly better than brute-force, i.e. exponential-time. Our techniques are a new interplay of three concepts for ROABP: low evaluation dimension, basis isolating weight assignment and low-support rank concentration. We relate basis isolation to rank concentration and extend it to a sum of two ROABPs using evaluation dimension (or partial derivatives).

Cite as

Rohit Gurjar, Arpita Korwar, Nitin Saxena, and Thomas Thierauf. Deterministic Identity Testing for Sum of Read-once Oblivious Arithmetic Branching Programs. In 30th Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC 2015). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 33, pp. 323-346, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2015)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gurjar_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2015.323,
  author =	{Gurjar, Rohit and Korwar, Arpita and Saxena, Nitin and Thierauf, Thomas},
  title =	{{Deterministic Identity Testing for Sum of Read-once Oblivious Arithmetic Branching Programs}},
  booktitle =	{30th Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC 2015)},
  pages =	{323--346},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-81-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2015},
  volume =	{33},
  editor =	{Zuckerman, David},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2015.323},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-50647},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2015.323},
  annote =	{Keywords: PIT, Hitting-set, Sum of ROABPs, Evaluation Dimension, Rank Concentration}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Gurjar, Rohit
  • 2 Korwar, Arpita
  • 2 Saxena, Nitin
  • 2 Thierauf, Thomas
  • 1 Morgan, Andrew
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Theory of computation → Algebraic complexity theory
  • 1 Theory of computation → Pseudorandomness and derandomization

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 PIT
  • 1 Arithmetic Branching Program
  • 1 Derandomization
  • 1 Evaluation Dimension
  • 1 Gröbner Basis
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 4 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2015
  • 1 2016
  • 1 2020
  • 1 2022

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail