20 Search Results for "Lyytinen, Kalle"


Document
Requirements Management – Novel Perspectives and Challenges (Dagstuhl Seminar 12442)

Authors: Jane Cleland-Huang, Matthias Jarke, Lin Liu, and Kalle Lyytinen

Published in: Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 2, Issue 10 (2013)


Abstract
This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 12442 "Requirements Management -- Novel Perspectives and Challenges". Changes in computational paradigms and capabilities that draw upon platform strategies, web services, and virtualization of both application services and development platforms have significant implications for views of modularity and requirements evolution, complexity of RE tasks, and the economics of system development and operations. The aim of the seminar was to bring together experts from multiple fields to discuss models and theories around these changes. Three key challenges and associated solution ideas were addressed, namely (1) to better deal with context changes and business goal management to reduce the "black swan" rate of badly failed large projects, (2) to exploit recent theories of technological and institutional evolution to understand better how to control complexity and leverage it for innovation at the same time, and (3) the demand for runtime re-organization of existing large-scale systems with respect to new operational goals such as energy efficiency. Future RE must see itself as the marketplace where responsibility for all these complexities and evolutionary steps is traded.

Cite as

Jane Cleland-Huang, Matthias Jarke, Lin Liu, and Kalle Lyytinen. Requirements Management – Novel Perspectives and Challenges (Dagstuhl Seminar 12442). In Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 2, Issue 10, pp. 117-152, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2013)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{clelandhuang_et_al:DagRep.2.10.117,
  author =	{Cleland-Huang, Jane and Jarke, Matthias and Liu, Lin and Lyytinen, Kalle},
  title =	{{Requirements Management – Novel Perspectives and Challenges (Dagstuhl Seminar 12442)}},
  pages =	{117--152},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Reports},
  ISSN =	{2192-5283},
  year =	{2013},
  volume =	{2},
  number =	{10},
  editor =	{Cleland-Huang, Jane and Jarke, Matthias and Liu, Lin and Lyytinen, Kalle},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagRep.2.10.117},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-39082},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagRep.2.10.117},
  annote =	{Keywords: requirements engineering; system complexity; software evolution; socio-technical systems}
}
Document
08412 Abstracts Collection – Science of Design : High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems

Authors: Matthias Jarke, Kalle Lyytinen, and John Mylopoulos

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems (2009)


Abstract
From 08.10. to 11.10.2008, the Dagstuhl Seminar 08412 ``Science of Design : High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems'' was held in Schloss Dagstuhl~--~Leibniz Center for Informatics. During the seminar, several participants presented their current research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section describes the seminar topics and goals in general. Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available.

Cite as

Matthias Jarke, Kalle Lyytinen, and John Mylopoulos. 08412 Abstracts Collection – Science of Design : High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems. In Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, pp. 1-13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2009)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jarke_et_al:DagSemProc.08412.1,
  author =	{Jarke, Matthias and Lyytinen, Kalle and Mylopoulos, John},
  title =	{{08412 Abstracts Collection – Science of Design : High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems }},
  booktitle =	{Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems},
  pages =	{1--13},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2009},
  volume =	{8412},
  editor =	{Matthias Jarke and Kalle Lyytinen and John Mylopoulos},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-19882},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Science of design, requirements engineering}
}
Document
08412 Manifesto – High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems

Authors: Matthias Jarke, Pericles Loucopoulos, Kalle Lyytinen, John Mylopoulos, and William Robinson

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems (2009)


Abstract
Despite its undoubted success in the last two decades, requirements engineering (RE) needs a better alignment between its research focus and its grounding in practical needs as these needs have changed significantly. We identify and explore changes in the environment, targets, and the process of RE that influence the nature of fundamental RE questions. Based on these explorations we propose four key principles that underlie current requirements processes and influence their successful resolution: (1) intertwining of requirements with implementation and organizational contexts, (2) dynamic evolution of requirements, (3) architectures as a critical stabilizing force, and (4) high levels of design complexity and necessity to employ new ways to mitigate it. We make recommendations to refocus RE research agenda as to meet better emerging and new challenges based on the review and analysis of these four key themes, and note several managerial and practical implications.

Cite as

Matthias Jarke, Pericles Loucopoulos, Kalle Lyytinen, John Mylopoulos, and William Robinson. 08412 Manifesto – High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems. In Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, pp. 1-18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2009)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jarke_et_al:DagSemProc.08412.3,
  author =	{Jarke, Matthias and Loucopoulos, Pericles and Lyytinen, Kalle and Mylopoulos, John and Robinson, William},
  title =	{{08412 Manifesto – High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems}},
  booktitle =	{Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems},
  pages =	{1--18},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2009},
  volume =	{8412},
  editor =	{Matthias Jarke and Kalle Lyytinen and John Mylopoulos},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-20287},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Science of design, requirements engineering, manifesto}
}
Document
Requirements in the 21st Century: Current Practice and Emerging Trends

Authors: Sean Hansen, Nicholas Berente, and Kalle Lyytinen

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems (2009)


Abstract
Requirements have remained one of the grand challenges in the design of software intensive systems. In this paper we review the main strands of requirements research over the past two decades and identify persistent and new challenges. Based on a field study that involved interviews of over 30 leading IT professionals involved in large and complex software design and implementation initiatives we review the current state-of-the-art in design requirements management. We observe significant progress in the deployment of modeling methods, tools, risk-driven design, and user involvement. We note nine emerging themes and challenges in the requirement management arena: 1) business process focus, 2) systems transparency, 3) integration focus, 4) distributed requirements, 5) layered requirements, 6) criticality of information architectures, 7) increased deployment of COTS and software components, 8) design fluidity and 9) interdependent complexity. Several research challenges and new avenues for research are noted in the discovery, specification, and validation of requirements in light of these requirements features.

Cite as

Sean Hansen, Nicholas Berente, and Kalle Lyytinen. Requirements in the 21st Century: Current Practice and Emerging Trends. In Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, pp. 1-57, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2009)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hansen_et_al:DagSemProc.08412.11,
  author =	{Hansen, Sean and Berente, Nicholas and Lyytinen, Kalle},
  title =	{{Requirements in the 21st Century: Current Practice and Emerging Trends}},
  booktitle =	{Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems},
  pages =	{1--57},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2009},
  volume =	{8412},
  editor =	{Matthias Jarke and Kalle Lyytinen and John Mylopoulos},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-19892},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: Requirements, modeling, specification, validation, verification, change, large systems, complexity, stakeholders, field study}
}
Document
08412 Executive Summary – Science of Design : High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems

Authors: Matthias Jarke, Kalle Lyytinen, and John Mylopoulos

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems (2009)


Abstract
This document gives a brief motivation for and summary of the perspectives workshop "Science of Design - High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems". The workshop was held in Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz Center for Informatics, October 8-11, 2008.

Cite as

Matthias Jarke, Kalle Lyytinen, and John Mylopoulos. 08412 Executive Summary – Science of Design : High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems. In Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, pp. 1-2, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2009)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jarke_et_al:DagSemProc.08412.2,
  author =	{Jarke, Matthias and Lyytinen, Kalle and Mylopoulos, John},
  title =	{{08412 Executive Summary – Science of Design : High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems}},
  booktitle =	{Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems},
  pages =	{1--2},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2009},
  volume =	{8412},
  editor =	{Matthias Jarke and Kalle Lyytinen and John Mylopoulos},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-19749},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Science of design, requirements engineering}
}
Document
08412 Seminar Outlines and Working Group Summaries

Authors: Matthias Jarke, Kalle Lyytinen, John Mylopoulos, Gerti Kappel, Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado Leite, Gloria Mark, Bala Ramesh, Dominik Schmitz, and Alistair G. Sutcliffe

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems (2009)


Abstract
This document gives a motivation for this perspective seminar within the Science of Design initiative, as well as an outline of the participants, agenda, sessions, and presentations. Furthermore, the outcomes of the five working group sessions are summarized: multiple concepts of design, evolution and management of requirements, stakeholder issues, intertwining requirements and design, and requirements, architecture and complexity.

Cite as

Matthias Jarke, Kalle Lyytinen, John Mylopoulos, Gerti Kappel, Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado Leite, Gloria Mark, Bala Ramesh, Dominik Schmitz, and Alistair G. Sutcliffe. 08412 Seminar Outlines and Working Group Summaries. In Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, pp. 1-12, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2009)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jarke_et_al:DagSemProc.08412.4,
  author =	{Jarke, Matthias and Lyytinen, Kalle and Mylopoulos, John and Kappel, Gerti and Leite, Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado and Mark, Gloria and Ramesh, Bala and Schmitz, Dominik and Sutcliffe, Alistair G.},
  title =	{{08412 Seminar Outlines and Working Group Summaries}},
  booktitle =	{Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems},
  pages =	{1--12},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2009},
  volume =	{8412},
  editor =	{Matthias Jarke and Kalle Lyytinen and John Mylopoulos},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-19730},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Seminar outline, working group summaries}
}
Document
'A Science of Design' is a Misled and Misleading Goal

Authors: Frederick P. Brooks

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems (2009)


Abstract
Simon, in advocating for a Science of Design, proposed a linear Rational Model of design as his science's central concept. Such a model occurs naturally to engineers. Indeed, it has been independently formally set forth several times: e.g., by Simon, by Paul and Beitz, and by Royce. Having a visual, geometric representation of a design process model is crucial, for designers are spatial thinkers. We most easily learn, think about, share, and talk in terms of a model with a clear geometric picture. But the linear, step-by-step Rational Model is misled in goal and approach. It does not accurately reflect what real designers do, nor what the best design thinkers identify as the essence of the design process. Science and design are fundamentally different activities. The goal of a Science of Design is also misleading. Its Rational Model leads to the too-early binding of requirements, leading in turn to bloated products and schedule/budget/performance disasters. The Rational Model has persisted in practice despite its inadequacies and plenty of cogent critiques. This is because builders and clients need contracts. Several alternative process models have been proposed. I find Boehm's Spiral Model the most promising. We also need to develop alternative contracting processes, perhaps adapting those from the building community.

Cite as

Frederick P. Brooks. 'A Science of Design' is a Misled and Misleading Goal. In Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, pp. 1-7, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2009)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{brooks:DagSemProc.08412.5,
  author =	{Brooks, Frederick P.},
  title =	{{'A Science of Design' is a Misled and Misleading Goal}},
  booktitle =	{Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems},
  pages =	{1--7},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2009},
  volume =	{8412},
  editor =	{Matthias Jarke and Kalle Lyytinen and John Mylopoulos},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-19762},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Science of design, rational model, spiral model}
}
Document
Action Design Research - An Integrative Research Method for Studying Design

Authors: Matti Rossi

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems (2009)


Abstract
It is the premise of this position paper that a combination of design research and action research can be very useful for studying high performance designs. However, there has been a separation between the two approaches. A growing body of literature is recognizing these cross fertilization possibilities between AR and DR. Researchers argue for similarity between the two (J'rvinen 2007; Lee 2007; Figueiredo and Cunha 2007) as well as caution against fusion (Iivari 2007). Others suggest a middle ground stating that in some situations and contexts, the two may be integrated (Cole et al. 2005; Sein et al. 2007).

Cite as

Matti Rossi. Action Design Research - An Integrative Research Method for Studying Design. In Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, pp. 1-3, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2009)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{rossi:DagSemProc.08412.6,
  author =	{Rossi, Matti},
  title =	{{Action Design Research - An Integrative Research Method for Studying Design}},
  booktitle =	{Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems},
  pages =	{1--3},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2009},
  volume =	{8412},
  editor =	{Matthias Jarke and Kalle Lyytinen and John Mylopoulos},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-19827},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Action research, Design research, Proactive research}
}
Document
Complexity, Requirements and Design

Authors: Alistair G. Sutcliffe

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems (2009)


Abstract
So why do we get worried about complex systems and what can we do about it? Complexity worries us because the world is unpredictable, large scale, multi component and densely interconnected. We perceived interactions as complex since we have difficulty in generalising over multiple events especially when events are poorly ordered. However interactional complexity is tractable by mathematical modeling as (misnamed) chaos theory has shown. Interactional complexity is being modeled with increasing accuracy by computational theories and simulations of physical and biological systems, viz. the IPCC world climate model. The second form is semantic complexity which implicates the difficulties we have in understanding intent of people. Here sadly there is no short term tractable solution. The Dagstuhl process of discussion leading to incremental (maybe radical) advances in understanding is one answer.

Cite as

Alistair G. Sutcliffe. Complexity, Requirements and Design. In Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, pp. 1-2, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2009)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{sutcliffe:DagSemProc.08412.7,
  author =	{Sutcliffe, Alistair G.},
  title =	{{Complexity, Requirements and Design}},
  booktitle =	{Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems},
  pages =	{1--2},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2009},
  volume =	{8412},
  editor =	{Matthias Jarke and Kalle Lyytinen and John Mylopoulos},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-19856},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Interactional complexity, semantic complexity}
}
Document
Distributed Cognition in the Management of Design Requirements

Authors: Sean Hansen and Kalle Lyytinen

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems (2009)


Abstract
In this position statement, we outline a new theoretical framework of the distribution of design requirements processes. Building upon the Theory of Distributed Cognition, we characterize contemporary requirements efforts as distributed cognitive systems in which elements of a design vision are distributed socially, structurally, and temporally. We discuss the various forms of distribution observed in real-world systems development projects and the processes by which representational states are propagated through the system. We conclude with a brief discussion of the implications of the framework for requirements research and practice.

Cite as

Sean Hansen and Kalle Lyytinen. Distributed Cognition in the Management of Design Requirements. In Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, pp. 1-10, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2009)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hansen_et_al:DagSemProc.08412.8,
  author =	{Hansen, Sean and Lyytinen, Kalle},
  title =	{{Distributed Cognition in the Management of Design Requirements}},
  booktitle =	{Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems},
  pages =	{1--10},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2009},
  volume =	{8412},
  editor =	{Matthias Jarke and Kalle Lyytinen and John Mylopoulos},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-19301},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: Distributed cognition, distributed requirements, COTS software, IT architecture}
}
Document
Effectuation for organizing design processes?

Authors: Isabelle Reymen

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems (2009)


Abstract
Design Science Methodology is the title of a course I developed/am developing. It tries to bridge design in engineering and social science, with the goal to learn industrial engineering and management students notions of design. With an engineering background (Architecture and some Computing Science), I am now Assistant Professor Design Processes in the Organization Science and Marketing group of Prof. Romme. I lecture in the Innovation Management Program of the Eindhoven University of Technology. I am very interested in thinking about new ways of organizing design processes and about how to deal with the new challenges of design science. My research focuses around "The design of processes for artifact creation", where artifacts can be new products, systems, discourse, businesses, markets, ... . I am also involved in a new initiative that plans to organize a workshop on Organizational Design and Engineering, which I like to share with the audience.

Cite as

Isabelle Reymen. Effectuation for organizing design processes?. In Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, pp. 1-2, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2009)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{reymen:DagSemProc.08412.9,
  author =	{Reymen, Isabelle},
  title =	{{Effectuation for organizing design processes?}},
  booktitle =	{Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems},
  pages =	{1--2},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2009},
  volume =	{8412},
  editor =	{Matthias Jarke and Kalle Lyytinen and John Mylopoulos},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-19818},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Design science, design process, organization design}
}
Document
Making sense of Design & Requirements Perspectives - & their Inter-relations

Authors: Liam Bannon

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems (2009)


Abstract
I see myself as a commentator or discussant at this workshop as my research interests are on the "edge" of the RE area. Thus, for me, the question of what perspective we bring to bear on the issues we are debating is paramount. What I find interesting in some of the recent discussions is to what extent the issues and problems we are facing today are novel and distinct from those we were facing 10 or even 20 years ago, and how these are being discussed nowadays and heretofore. I provide some personal context for these remarks and show both some similarities and possible differences over the years in the ongoing discussions.

Cite as

Liam Bannon. Making sense of Design & Requirements Perspectives - & their Inter-relations. In Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, pp. 1-6, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2009)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bannon:DagSemProc.08412.10,
  author =	{Bannon, Liam},
  title =	{{Making sense of Design \& Requirements Perspectives - \& their Inter-relations}},
  booktitle =	{Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems},
  pages =	{1--6},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2009},
  volume =	{8412},
  editor =	{Matthias Jarke and Kalle Lyytinen and John Mylopoulos},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-19758},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: Perspectives, evolution, process, iteration, prototyping}
}
Document
Requirements Engineering Domain Dimensions

Authors: Alistair G. Sutcliffe

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems (2009)


Abstract
This doc gives my initial ideas on the dimensions/criteria for different genres of applications (or domains if you prefer), following my summary presentation at the Dagstuhl workshop.

Cite as

Alistair G. Sutcliffe. Requirements Engineering Domain Dimensions. In Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, pp. 1-2, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2009)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{sutcliffe:DagSemProc.08412.12,
  author =	{Sutcliffe, Alistair G.},
  title =	{{Requirements Engineering Domain Dimensions}},
  booktitle =	{Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems},
  pages =	{1--2},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2009},
  volume =	{8412},
  editor =	{Matthias Jarke and Kalle Lyytinen and John Mylopoulos},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-19848},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Domain dimensions, genres of applications, follow-up}
}
Document
Requirements Engineering for Control Systems

Authors: Dominik Schmitz

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems (2009)


Abstract
Nowadays, more and more controllers in automobiles are realised in software on electronic control units. This contribution reports on a joined project of control system engineers and software engineers that aims at a better integration of these two disciplines. Focussing the requirements engineering part, the relevant issues for control systems are set in relation to the previously identified four key requirements principles.

Cite as

Dominik Schmitz. Requirements Engineering for Control Systems. In Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, pp. 1-2, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2009)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{schmitz:DagSemProc.08412.13,
  author =	{Schmitz, Dominik},
  title =	{{Requirements Engineering for Control Systems}},
  booktitle =	{Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems},
  pages =	{1--2},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2009},
  volume =	{8412},
  editor =	{Matthias Jarke and Kalle Lyytinen and John Mylopoulos},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-19831},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: Requirements engineering, control systems}
}
Document
Requirements Engineering for Social Software

Authors: Anna Glukhova

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems (2009)


Abstract
Social software bears some special characteristics for requirements engineering (RE) like user-centeredness, self-organization and voluntarism. No concrete formalization of the RE process for social software has been established so far. In this position paper, important aspects of social contexts will be considered in order to define requirements, referring to the previously identified four key requirements principles.

Cite as

Anna Glukhova. Requirements Engineering for Social Software. In Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8412, pp. 1-3, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2009)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{glukhova:DagSemProc.08412.14,
  author =	{Glukhova, Anna},
  title =	{{Requirements Engineering for Social Software}},
  booktitle =	{Perspectives Workshop: Science of Design: High-Impact Requirements for Software-Intensive Systems},
  pages =	{1--3},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2009},
  volume =	{8412},
  editor =	{Matthias Jarke and Kalle Lyytinen and John Mylopoulos},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.14},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-19777},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.08412.14},
  annote =	{Keywords: Social software, web 2.0, requirements engineering, collaborative systems, communities}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 9 Lyytinen, Kalle
  • 5 Jarke, Matthias
  • 5 Mylopoulos, John
  • 4 Hansen, Sean
  • 3 Sutcliffe, Alistair G.
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 5 requirements engineering
  • 4 Science of design
  • 3 distributed requirements
  • 2 Requirements engineering
  • 2 Requirements practice
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 20 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 19 2009
  • 1 2013

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail