61 Search Results for "Schaub, Torsten"


Volume

LIPIcs, Volume 7

Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming

ICLP 2010, July 16-19, 2010, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

Editors: Manuel Hermenegildo and Torsten Schaub

Document
Invited Talk
Temporal Modalities in Answer Set Programming (Invited Talk)

Authors: Pedro Cabalar

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 178, 27th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2020)


Abstract
Based on the answer set (or stable model) semantics for logic programs, Answer Set Programming (ASP) has become one of the most successful paradigms for practical Knowledge Representation and problem solving. Although ASP is naturally equipped for solving static combinatorial problems up to NP complexity (or ΣP2 in the disjunctive case) its application to temporal scenarios has been frequent since its very beginning, partly due to its early use for reasoning about actions and change. Temporal problems normally suppose an extra challenge for ASP for several reasons. On the one hand, they normally raise the complexity (in the case of classical planning, for instance, it becomes PSPACE-complete), although this is usually accounted for by making repeated calls to an ASP solver. On the other hand, temporal scenarios also pose a representational challenge, since the basic ASP language does not support temporal expressions. To fill this representational gap, a temporal extension of ASP called Temporal Equilibrium Logic (TEL) was proposed in and extensively studied later. This formalism constitutes a modal, linear-time extension of Equilibrium Logic which, in its turn, is a complete logical characterisation of (standard) ASP based on the intermediate logic of Here-and-There (HT). As a result, TEL is an expressive non-monotonic modal logic that shares the syntax of Linear-Time Temporal Logic (LTL) but interprets temporal formulas under a non-monotonic semantics that properly extends stable models.

Cite as

Pedro Cabalar. Temporal Modalities in Answer Set Programming (Invited Talk). In 27th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 178, pp. 2:1-2:5, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cabalar:LIPIcs.TIME.2020.2,
  author =	{Cabalar, Pedro},
  title =	{{Temporal Modalities in Answer Set Programming}},
  booktitle =	{27th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2020)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:5},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-167-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{178},
  editor =	{Mu\~{n}oz-Velasco, Emilio and Ozaki, Ana and Theobald, Martin},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2020.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-129707},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2020.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Logic Programming, Temporal Logic, Answer Set Programming, Modal Logic}
}
Document
Theory Solving Made Easy with Clingo 5

Authors: Martin Gebser, Roland Kaminski, Benjamin Kaufmann, Max Ostrowski, Torsten Schaub, and Philipp Wanko

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 52, Technical Communications of the 32nd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2016)


Abstract
Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a model, ground, and solve paradigm. The integration of application- or theory-specific reasoning into ASP systems thus impacts on many if not all elements of its workflow, viz. input language, grounding, intermediate language, solving, and output format. We address this challenge with the fifth generation of the ASP system clingo and its grounding and solving components by equipping them with well-defined generic interfaces facilitating the manifold integration efforts. On the grounder's side, we introduce a generic way of specifying language extensions and propose an intermediate format accommodating their ground representation. At the solver end, this is accompanied by high-level interfaces easing the integration of theory propagators dealing with these extensions.

Cite as

Martin Gebser, Roland Kaminski, Benjamin Kaufmann, Max Ostrowski, Torsten Schaub, and Philipp Wanko. Theory Solving Made Easy with Clingo 5. In Technical Communications of the 32nd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2016). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 52, pp. 2:1-2:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gebser_et_al:OASIcs.ICLP.2016.2,
  author =	{Gebser, Martin and Kaminski, Roland and Kaufmann, Benjamin and Ostrowski, Max and Schaub, Torsten and Wanko, Philipp},
  title =	{{Theory Solving Made Easy with Clingo 5}},
  booktitle =	{Technical Communications of the 32nd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2016)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:15},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-007-1},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{52},
  editor =	{Carro, Manuel and King, Andy and Saeedloei, Neda and De Vos, Marina},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2016.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-67337},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2016.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Answer Set Programming, Theory Language, Theory Propagation}
}
Document
Computing Diverse Optimal Stable Models

Authors: Javier Romero, Torsten Schaub, and Philipp Wanko

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 52, Technical Communications of the 32nd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2016)


Abstract
We introduce a comprehensive framework for computing diverse (or similar) solutions to logic programs with preferences. Our framework provides a wide spectrum of complete and incomplete methods for solving this task. Apart from proposing several new methods, it also accommodates existing ones and generalizes them to programs with preferences. Interestingly, this is accomplished by integrating and automating several basic ASP techniques - being of general interest even beyond diversification. The enabling factor of this lies in the recent advance of multi-shot ASP solving that provides us with fine-grained control over reasoning processes and abolishes the need for solver modifications and wrappers that were indispensable in previous approaches. Our framework is implemented as an extension to the ASP-based preference handling system asprin. We use the resulting system asprin 2 for an empirical evaluation of the diversification methods comprised in our framework.

Cite as

Javier Romero, Torsten Schaub, and Philipp Wanko. Computing Diverse Optimal Stable Models. In Technical Communications of the 32nd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2016). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 52, pp. 3:1-3:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{romero_et_al:OASIcs.ICLP.2016.3,
  author =	{Romero, Javier and Schaub, Torsten and Wanko, Philipp},
  title =	{{Computing Diverse Optimal Stable Models}},
  booktitle =	{Technical Communications of the 32nd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2016)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:14},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-007-1},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{52},
  editor =	{Carro, Manuel and King, Andy and Saeedloei, Neda and De Vos, Marina},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2016.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-67348},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2016.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Answer Set Programming, Diversity, Similarity, Preferences}
}
Document
Answer Set Solving with Generalized Learned Constraints

Authors: Martin Gebser, Roland Kaminski, Benjamin Kaufmann, Patrick Lühne, Javier Romero, and Torsten Schaub

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 52, Technical Communications of the 32nd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2016)


Abstract
Conflict learning plays a key role in modern Boolean constraint solving. Advanced in satisfiability testing, it has meanwhile become a base technology in many neighboring fields, among them answer set programming (ASP). However, learned constraints are only valid for a currently solved problem instance and do not carry over to similar instances. We address this issue in ASP and introduce a framework featuring an integrated feedback loop that allows for reusing conflict constraints. The idea is to extract (propositional) conflict constraints, generalize and validate them, and reuse them as integrity constraints. Although we explore our approach in the context of dynamic applications based on transition systems, it is driven by the ultimate objective of overcoming the issue that learned knowledge is bound to specific problem instances. We implemented this workflow in two systems, namely, a variant of the ASP solver clasp that extracts integrity constraints along with a downstream system for generalizing and validating them.

Cite as

Martin Gebser, Roland Kaminski, Benjamin Kaufmann, Patrick Lühne, Javier Romero, and Torsten Schaub. Answer Set Solving with Generalized Learned Constraints. In Technical Communications of the 32nd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2016). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 52, pp. 9:1-9:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gebser_et_al:OASIcs.ICLP.2016.9,
  author =	{Gebser, Martin and Kaminski, Roland and Kaufmann, Benjamin and L\"{u}hne, Patrick and Romero, Javier and Schaub, Torsten},
  title =	{{Answer Set Solving with Generalized Learned Constraints}},
  booktitle =	{Technical Communications of the 32nd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2016)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:15},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-007-1},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{52},
  editor =	{Carro, Manuel and King, Andy and Saeedloei, Neda and De Vos, Marina},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2016.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-67393},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2016.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Answer Set Programming, Conflict Learning, Constraint Generalization, Generalized Constraint Feedback}
}
Document
Complete Volume
LIPIcs, Volume 7, ICLP'10, Complete Volume

Authors: Manuel Hermenegildo and Torsten Schaub

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 7, Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming (2010)


Abstract
LIPIcs, Volume 7, ICLP'10, Complete Volume

Cite as

Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 7, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2013)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Proceedings{hermenegildo_et_al:LIPIcs.ICLP.2010,
  title =	{{LIPIcs, Volume 7, ICLP'10, Complete Volume}},
  booktitle =	{Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-17-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2013},
  volume =	{7},
  editor =	{Hermenegildo, Manuel and Schaub, Torsten},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2010},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-41018},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2010},
  annote =	{Keywords: Logic Programming, Concurrent Programming, Distribution, Maintenance, and Enhancement, Language Classifications, Language Constructs and Features Software/ Program Verification, Models of Computation, Modes of Computation, Semantics of Programming Languages, Mathematical Logic}
}
Document
aspeed: ASP-based Solver Scheduling

Authors: Holger Hoos, Roland Kaminski, Torsten Schaub, and Marius Schneider

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 17, Technical Communications of the 28th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'12) (2012)


Abstract
Although Boolean Constraint Technology has made tremendous progress over the last decade, it suffers from a great sensitivity to search configuration. This problem was impressively counterbalanced at the 2011 SAT Competition by the rather simple approach of ppfolio relying on a handmade, uniform and unordered solver schedule. Inspired by this, we take advantage of the modeling and solving capacities of ASP to automatically determine more refined, that is, non-uniform and ordered solver schedules from existing benchmarking data. We begin by formulating the determination of such schedules as multi-criteria optimization problems and provide corresponding ASP encodings. The resulting encodings are easily customizable for different settings and the computation of optimum schedules can mostly be done in the blink of an eye, even when dealing with large runtime data sets stemming from many solvers on hundreds to thousands of instances. Also, its high customizability made it easy to generate even parallel schedules for multi-core machines.

Cite as

Holger Hoos, Roland Kaminski, Torsten Schaub, and Marius Schneider. aspeed: ASP-based Solver Scheduling. In Technical Communications of the 28th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'12). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 17, pp. 176-187, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2012)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hoos_et_al:LIPIcs.ICLP.2012.176,
  author =	{Hoos, Holger and Kaminski, Roland and Schaub, Torsten and Schneider, Marius},
  title =	{{aspeed: ASP-based Solver Scheduling}},
  booktitle =	{Technical Communications of the 28th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'12)},
  pages =	{176--187},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-43-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2012},
  volume =	{17},
  editor =	{Dovier, Agostino and Santos Costa, V{\'\i}tor},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2012.176},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-36208},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2012.176},
  annote =	{Keywords: Algorithm Schedule, Portfolio-based Solving, Answer Set Programming}
}
Document
Unsatisfiability-based optimization in clasp

Authors: Benjamin Andres, Benjamin Kaufmann, Oliver Matheis, and Torsten Schaub

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 17, Technical Communications of the 28th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'12) (2012)


Abstract
Answer Set Programming (ASP) features effective optimization capacities based on branch-and-bound algorithms. Unlike this, in the area of Satisfiability Testing (SAT) the finding of minimum unsatisfiable cores was put forward as an alternative approach to solving Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT) problems. We explore this alternative approach to optimization in the context of ASP. To this end, we extended the ASP solver clasp with optimization components based upon the computation of minimal unsatisfiable cores. The resulting system, unclasp, is based on an extension of the well-known algorithms msu1 and msu3 and tailored to the characteristics of ASP. We evaluate our system on multi-criteria optimization problems stemming from realistic Linux package configuration problems. In fact, the ASP-based Linux configuration system aspuncud relies on unclasp and won four out of seven tracks at the 2011 MISC competition.

Cite as

Benjamin Andres, Benjamin Kaufmann, Oliver Matheis, and Torsten Schaub. Unsatisfiability-based optimization in clasp. In Technical Communications of the 28th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'12). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 17, pp. 212-221, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2012)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{andres_et_al:LIPIcs.ICLP.2012.211,
  author =	{Andres, Benjamin and Kaufmann, Benjamin and Matheis, Oliver and Schaub, Torsten},
  title =	{{Unsatisfiability-based optimization in clasp}},
  booktitle =	{Technical Communications of the 28th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'12)},
  pages =	{212--221},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-43-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2012},
  volume =	{17},
  editor =	{Dovier, Agostino and Santos Costa, V{\'\i}tor},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2012.211},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-36235},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2012.211},
  annote =	{Keywords: answer-set-programming, solvers}
}
Document
Multi-Criteria Optimization in Answer Set Programming

Authors: Martin Gebser, Roland Kaminski, Benjamin Kaufmann, and Torsten Schaub

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 11, Technical Communications of the 27th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'11) (2011)


Abstract
We elaborate upon new strategies and heuristics for solving multi-criteria optimization problems via Answer Set Programming (ASP). In particular, we conceive a new solving algorithm, based on conflictdriven learning, allowing for non-uniform descents during optimization. We apply these techniques to solve realistic Linux package configuration problems. To this end, we describe the Linux package configuration tool aspcud and compare its performance with systems pursuing alternative approaches.

Cite as

Martin Gebser, Roland Kaminski, Benjamin Kaufmann, and Torsten Schaub. Multi-Criteria Optimization in Answer Set Programming. In Technical Communications of the 27th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'11). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 11, pp. 1-10, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2011)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gebser_et_al:LIPIcs.ICLP.2011.1,
  author =	{Gebser, Martin and Kaminski, Roland and Kaufmann, Benjamin and Schaub, Torsten},
  title =	{{Multi-Criteria Optimization in Answer Set Programming}},
  booktitle =	{Technical Communications of the 27th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'11)},
  pages =	{1--10},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-31-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2011},
  volume =	{11},
  editor =	{Gallagher, John P. and Gelfond, Michael},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2011.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-31617},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2011.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Answer Set Programming, Multi-Criteria Optimization, Linux Package Configuration}
}
Document
Evolution of Ontologies using ASP

Authors: Max Ostrowski, Giorgos Flouris, Torsten Schaub, and Grigoris Antoniou

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 11, Technical Communications of the 27th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'11) (2011)


Abstract
RDF/S ontologies are often used in e-science to express domain knowledge regarding the respective field of investigation (e.g., cultural informatics, bioinformatics etc). Such ontologies need to change often to reflect the latest scientific understanding on the domain at hand, and are usually associated with constraints expressed using various declarative formalisms to express domain-specific requirements, such as cardinality or acyclicity constraints. Addressing the evolution of ontologies in the presence of ontological constraints imposes extra difficulties, because it forces us to respect the associated constraints during evolution. While these issues were addressed in previous work, this is the first work to examine how ASP techniques can be applied to model and implement the evolution process. ASP was chosen for its advantages in terms of a principled, rather than ad hoc implementation, its modularity and flexibility, and for being a state-of-the-art technique to tackle hard combinatorial problems. In particular, our approach consists in providing a general translation of the problem into ASP, thereby reducing it to an instance of an ASP program that can be solved by an ASP solver. Our experiments are promising, even for large ontologies, and also show that the scalability of the approach depends on the morphology of the input.

Cite as

Max Ostrowski, Giorgos Flouris, Torsten Schaub, and Grigoris Antoniou. Evolution of Ontologies using ASP. In Technical Communications of the 27th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'11). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 11, pp. 16-27, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2011)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ostrowski_et_al:LIPIcs.ICLP.2011.16,
  author =	{Ostrowski, Max and Flouris, Giorgos and Schaub, Torsten and Antoniou, Grigoris},
  title =	{{Evolution of Ontologies using ASP}},
  booktitle =	{Technical Communications of the 27th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'11)},
  pages =	{16--27},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-31-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2011},
  volume =	{11},
  editor =	{Gallagher, John P. and Gelfond, Michael},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2011.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-31747},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2011.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: Ontology evolution, Evolution in the presence of constraints, incremental ASP application}
}
Document
Front Matter
Titlepage, Table of Contents, Conference Organization

Authors: Manuel Hermenegildo and Torsten Schaub

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 7, Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming (2010)


Abstract
Frontmatter including titlepage, table of contents and conference organization.

Cite as

Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 7, pp. i-x, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2010)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hermenegildo_et_al:LIPIcs.ICLP.2010.i,
  author =	{Hermenegildo, Manuel and Schaub, Torsten},
  title =	{{Titlepage, Table of Contents, Conference Organization}},
  booktitle =	{Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming},
  pages =	{i--x},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-17-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2010},
  volume =	{7},
  editor =	{Hermenegildo, Manuel and Schaub, Torsten},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2010.i},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-26161},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2010.i},
  annote =	{Keywords: Titlepage, Table of Contents, Conference Organization}
}
Document
Introduction to the Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming

Authors: Manuel Hermenegildo and Torsten Schaub

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 7, Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming (2010)


Abstract
Introduction to the Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming.

Cite as

Manuel Hermenegildo and Torsten Schaub. Introduction to the Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming. In Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 7, pp. 11-14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2010)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hermenegildo_et_al:LIPIcs.ICLP.2010.XI,
  author =	{Hermenegildo, Manuel and Schaub, Torsten},
  title =	{{Introduction to the Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming}},
  booktitle =	{Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming},
  pages =	{11--14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-17-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2010},
  volume =	{7},
  editor =	{Hermenegildo, Manuel and Schaub, Torsten},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2010.XI},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-26154},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2010.XI},
  annote =	{Keywords: Introduction}
}
Document
Invited Talk
Datalog for Enterprise Software: from Industrial Applications to Research (Invited Talk)

Authors: Molham Aref

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 7, Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming (2010)


Abstract
LogicBlox is a platform for the rapid development of enterprise applications in the domains of decision automation, analytics, and planning. Although the LogicBlox platform embodies several components and technology decisions (e.g., an emphasis on software-as- a-service), the key substrate and glue is an implementation of the Datalog language. All application development on the LogicBlox platform is done declaratively in Datalog: The language is used to query large data sets, but also to develop web and desktop GUIs (with the help of pre-defined libraries), to interface with solvers, statistics tools, and optimizers for complex analytics solutions, and to express the overall business logic of the application. The goal of this talk is to present both the business case for Datalog and the fruitful interaction of research and industrial applications in the LogicBlox context.

Cite as

Molham Aref. Datalog for Enterprise Software: from Industrial Applications to Research (Invited Talk). In Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 7, p. 1, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2010)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{aref:LIPIcs.ICLP.2010.1,
  author =	{Aref, Molham},
  title =	{{Datalog for Enterprise Software: from Industrial Applications to Research}},
  booktitle =	{Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming},
  pages =	{1--1},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-17-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2010},
  volume =	{7},
  editor =	{Hermenegildo, Manuel and Schaub, Torsten},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2010.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-25762},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2010.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Datalog, decision automation, analytics, planning}
}
Document
Invited Talk
A Logical Paradigm for Systems Biology (Invited Talk)

Authors: François Fages

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 7, Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming (2010)


Abstract
Biologists use diagrams to represent complex systems of interaction between molecular species. These graphical notations encompass two types of information: interactions (e.g. protein complexation, modification, binding to a gene, etc.) and regulations (of an interaction or a transcription). Based on these structures, mathematical models can be developed by equipping such molecular interaction networks with kinetic expressions leading to quantitative models of mainly two kinds: ordinary differential equations for a continuous interpretation of the kinetics and continuous-time Markov chains for a stochastic interpretation of the kinetics. Since 2002, we investigate the transposition of programming concepts and tools to the analysis of living processes at the cellular level.

Cite as

François Fages. A Logical Paradigm for Systems Biology (Invited Talk). In Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 7, pp. 2-3, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2010)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fages:LIPIcs.ICLP.2010.2,
  author =	{Fages, Fran\c{c}ois},
  title =	{{A Logical Paradigm for Systems Biology}},
  booktitle =	{Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming},
  pages =	{2--3},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-17-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2010},
  volume =	{7},
  editor =	{Hermenegildo, Manuel and Schaub, Torsten},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2010.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-25776},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2010.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: temporal logic, model-checking, systems biology, hybrid systems}
}
Document
Runtime Addition of Integrity Constraints in an Abductive Proof Procedure

Authors: Marco Alberti, Marco Gavanelli, and Evelina Lamma

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 7, Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming (2010)


Abstract
Abductive Logic Programming is a computationally founded representation of abductive reasoning. In most ALP frameworks, integrity constraints express domainspecific logical relationships that abductive answers are required to satisfy. Integrity constraints are usually known a priori. However, in some applications (such as interactive abductive logic programming, multi-agent interactions, contracting) it makes sense to relax this assumption, in order to let the abductive reasoning start with incomplete knowledge of integrity constraints, and to continue without restarting when new integrity constraints become known. In this paper, we propose a declarative semantics for abductive logic programming with addition of integrity constraints during the abductive reasoning process, an operational instantiation (with formal termination, soundness and completeness properties) and an implementation of such a framework based on the SCIFF language and proof procedure.

Cite as

Marco Alberti, Marco Gavanelli, and Evelina Lamma. Runtime Addition of Integrity Constraints in an Abductive Proof Procedure. In Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 7, pp. 4-13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2010)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{alberti_et_al:LIPIcs.ICLP.2010.4,
  author =	{Alberti, Marco and Gavanelli, Marco and Lamma, Evelina},
  title =	{{Runtime Addition of Integrity Constraints in an Abductive Proof Procedure}},
  booktitle =	{Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming},
  pages =	{4--13},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-17-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2010},
  volume =	{7},
  editor =	{Hermenegildo, Manuel and Schaub, Torsten},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2010.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-25784},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2010.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Abduction, semantics, interactive computation, proof procedure}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 14 Schaub, Torsten
  • 4 Kaminski, Roland
  • 4 Kaufmann, Benjamin
  • 3 Brewka, Gerhard
  • 3 Gebser, Martin
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Logic programming and answer set programming
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Nonmonotonic, default reasoning and belief revision
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Temporal reasoning
  • 1 Theory of computation → Constraint and logic programming
  • 1 Theory of computation → Modal and temporal logics

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 7 Answer Set Programming
  • 4 Answer set programming
  • 4 logic programming
  • 3 Inductive Logic Programming
  • 2 Co-induction
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 60 document
  • 1 volume

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 42 2010
  • 8 2005
  • 3 2016
  • 2 2003
  • 2 2011
  • Show More...

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail