2 Search Results for "Tate, Ross"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SNAPL.2019.6
The Dynamic Practice and Static Theory of Gradual Typing

Authors: Michael Greenberg

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 136, 3rd Summit on Advances in Programming Languages (SNAPL 2019)

Abstract
We can tease apart the research on gradual types into two `lineages': a pragmatic, implementation-oriented dynamic-first lineage and a formal, type-theoretic, static-first lineage. The dynamic-first lineage’s focus is on taming particular idioms - `pre-existing conditions' in untyped programming languages. The static-first lineage’s focus is on interoperation and individual type system features, rather than the collection of features found in any particular language. Both appear in programming languages research under the name "gradual typing", and they are in active conversation with each other. What are these two lineages? What challenges and opportunities await the static-first lineage? What progress has been made so far?
Cite as

Michael Greenberg. The Dynamic Practice and Static Theory of Gradual Typing. In 3rd Summit on Advances in Programming Languages (SNAPL 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 136, pp. 6:1-6:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{greenberg:LIPIcs.SNAPL.2019.6,
  author =	{Greenberg, Michael},
  title =	{{The Dynamic Practice and Static Theory of Gradual Typing}},
  booktitle =	{3rd Summit on Advances in Programming Languages (SNAPL 2019)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-113-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{136},
  editor =	{Lerner, Benjamin S. and Bod{\'\i}k, Rastislav and Krishnamurthi, Shriram},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SNAPL.2019.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-105495},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SNAPL.2019.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: dynamic typing, gradual typing, static typing, implementation, theory, challenge problems}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2017.3
Retargeting Gradual Typing (Invited Talk)

Authors: Ross Tate

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 74, 31st European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2017)

Abstract
Gradual typing is often motivated by efforts to add types to massive untyped code bases. A major challenge here is the fact that these code bases were not written with types in mind, yet the goal is to add types to them without requiring any significant changes in their implementation. Thus, critical to this application is the notion that gradual typing is being added onto a preexisting system. But gradual typing also has applications in education, prototyping, and scripting. It allows programmers to ignore types while they are learning programmatic reasoning, while they are experimenting with new designs, or while they are interacting with external systems. At the same time, gradual typing allows these programmers to utilize APIs with types that provide navigable documentation, that concisely describe interfaces, and that enable IDEs to provide assistance. In these applications, programmers are working with types even when they are not writing types. By targeting just these applications, we can lift a major burden from gradual typing. Rather than being added to something that already exists, here gradual typing can be integrated into the software-development process, into the core language design, and into the run-time environment, with each component designed to support gradual typing from conception. This retargeting provides significant flexibility, enabling designers to tradeoff various capabilities of gradual typing. For example, a designer might choose to require some minor annotation burden in untyped programs for, say, a hundred-fold improvement in run-time performance. For the past half decade I have been exploring gradual typing behind the scenes in both academia and industry, and I will be presenting my experiences with these design tradeoffs so far.
Cite as

Ross Tate. Retargeting Gradual Typing (Invited Talk). In 31st European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 74, p. 3:1, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{tate:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2017.3,
  author =	{Tate, Ross},
  title =	{{Retargeting Gradual Typing}},
  booktitle =	{31st European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2017)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:1},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-035-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{74},
  editor =	{M\"{u}ller, Peter},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2017.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-72802},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2017.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Design, Efficiency, Gradual Typing, Nominal Types}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 1 Greenberg, Michael
  • 1 Tate, Ross

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Social and professional topics → History of programming languages
  • 1 Software and its engineering → Language features

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Design
  • 1 Efficiency
  • 1 Gradual Typing
  • 1 Nominal Types
  • 1 challenge problems
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 2 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2017
  • 1 2019

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact