Advice Lower Bounds for the Dense Model Theorem

Author Thomas Watson



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.STACS.2013.634.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.58 MB
  • 12 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Thomas Watson

Cite AsGet BibTex

Thomas Watson. Advice Lower Bounds for the Dense Model Theorem. In 30th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2013). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 20, pp. 634-645, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2013)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2013.634

Abstract

We prove a lower bound on the amount of nonuniform advice needed by black-box reductions for the Dense Model Theorem of Green, Tao, and Ziegler, and of Reingold, Trevisan, Tulsiani, and Vadhan. The latter theorem roughly says that for every distribution D that is delta-dense in a distribution that is epsilon'-indistinguishable from uniform, there exists a "dense model" for D, that is, a distribution that is delta-dense in the uniform distribution and is epsilon-indistinguishable from D. This epsilon-indistinguishability is with respect to an arbitrary small class of functions F. For the natural case where epsilon' >= Omega(epsilon delta) and epsilon >= delta^{O(1)}, our lower bound implies that Omega(sqrt{(1/epsilon)log(1/delta)} log|F|) advice bits are necessary. There is only a polynomial gap between our lower bound and the best upper bound for this case (due to Zhang), which is O((1/epsilon^2)log(1/delta) log|F|). Our lower bound can be viewed as an analog of list size lower bounds for list-decoding of error-correcting codes, but for "dense model decoding" instead. Our proof introduces some new techniques which may be of independent interest, including an analysis of a majority of majorities of p-biased bits. The latter analysis uses an extremely tight lower bound on the tail of the binomial distribution, which we could not find in the literature.
Keywords
  • Pseudorandomness
  • advice lower bounds
  • dense model theorem

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail