License
When quoting this document, please refer to the following
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2017.31
URN: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-74575
URL: http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2017/7457/
Go to the corresponding LIPIcs Volume Portal


Antoniadis, Antonios ; Hoeksma, Ruben ; Mei▀ner, Julie ; Verschae, JosÚ ; Wiese, Andreas

A QPTAS for the General Scheduling Problem with Identical Release Dates

pdf-format:
LIPIcs-ICALP-2017-31.pdf (0.5 MB)


Abstract

The General Scheduling Problem (GSP) generalizes scheduling problems with sum of cost objectives such as weighted flow time and weighted tardiness. Given a set of jobs with processing times, release dates, and job dependent cost functions, we seek to find a minimum cost preemptive schedule on a single machine. The best known algorithm for this problem and also for weighted flow time/tardiness is an O(loglog P)-approximation (where P denotes the range of the job processing times), while the best lower bound shows only strong NP-hardness. When release dates are identical there is also a gap: the problem remains strongly NP-hard and the best known approximation algorithm has a ratio of e+\epsilon (running in quasi-polynomial time). We reduce the latter gap by giving a QPTAS if the numbers in the input are quasi-polynomially bounded, ruling out the existence of an APX-hardness proof unless NP\subseteq DTIME(2^polylog(n)). Our techniques are based on the QPTAS known for the UFP-Cover problem, a particular case of GSP where we must pick a subset of intervals (jobs) on the real line with associated heights and costs. If an interval is selected, its height will help cover a given demand on any point contained within the interval. We reduce our problem to a generalization of UFP-Cover and use a sophisticated divide-and-conquer procedure with interdependent non-symmetric subproblems. We also present a pseudo-polynomial time approximation scheme for two variants of UFP-Cover. For the case of agreeable intervals we give an algorithm based on a new dynamic programming approach which might be useful for other problems of this type. The second one is a resource augmentation setting where we are allowed to slightly enlarge each interval.

BibTeX - Entry

@InProceedings{antoniadis_et_al:LIPIcs:2017:7457,
  author =	{Antonios Antoniadis and Ruben Hoeksma and Julie Mei{\ss}ner and Jos{\'e} Verschae and Andreas Wiese},
  title =	{{A QPTAS for the General Scheduling Problem with Identical Release Dates}},
  booktitle =	{44th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2017)},
  pages =	{31:1--31:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-041-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{80},
  editor =	{Ioannis Chatzigiannakis and Piotr Indyk and Fabian Kuhn and Anca Muscholl},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl--Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2017/7457},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-74575},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2017.31},
  annote =	{Keywords: Generalized Scheduling, QPTAS, Unsplittable Flows}
}

Keywords: Generalized Scheduling, QPTAS, Unsplittable Flows
Seminar: 44th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2017)
Issue Date: 2017
Date of publication: 06.07.2017


DROPS-Home | Fulltext Search | Imprint Published by LZI