Deconstructed and Inverted Multi-Criteria Evaluation for On-The-Fly Scenario Development and Decision-Making (Short Paper)

Authors Martin Geilhausen , Patrick Laube



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.GISCIENCE.2018.27.pdf
  • Filesize: 1.3 MB
  • 7 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Martin Geilhausen
  • Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Natural Resource Sciences, Campus Grüental, Wädenswil, Switzerland
Patrick Laube
  • Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Natural Resource Sciences, Campus Grüental, Wädenswil, Switzerland

Cite AsGet BibTex

Martin Geilhausen and Patrick Laube. Deconstructed and Inverted Multi-Criteria Evaluation for On-The-Fly Scenario Development and Decision-Making (Short Paper). In 10th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 114, pp. 27:1-27:7, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.GISCIENCE.2018.27

Abstract

We propose a variation of the conventional spatial multi-criteria evaluation workflow for suitability analysis that allows efficient on-the fly scenario development for decision-making. Our approach proposes to reconstruct the conventional MCE workflow in order to exclude computationally expensive geoprocessing from the iterative scenario development. We then introduce a procedure that replaces costly iterations of spatial operations with one off-line preprocessing step followed by iterations of much less computationally expensive database queries. We illustrate our approach for deconstructed and inverted multi-criteria analysis with a case study aiming at selecting suitable sites for wind turbines in the Swiss alps.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Information systems → Geographic information systems
  • Information systems → Data analytics
  • Information systems → Expert systems
Keywords
  • Multi-criteria evaluation
  • efficiency
  • decision-making
  • data structures

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Mattia Cattaneo and Leonhard Zwiauer. Concept windenergy - Federal guidelines for planning windenergy installations. Technical report, Swiss Federal Office for Spatial Development, 2017. Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtiar Feizizadeh, Piotr Jankowski, and Thomas Blaschke. A GIS based spatially-explicit sensitivity and uncertainty analysis approach for multi-criteria decision analysis. Computers &geosciences, 64:81-95, 2014. Google Scholar
  3. Montserrat Gómez-Delgado and Stefano Tarantola. Global sensitivity analysis, GIS and multi-criteria evaluation for a sustainable planning of a hazardous waste disposal site in spain. Int.J. of Geographical Information Science, 20(4):449-466, 2006. Google Scholar
  4. Isabel Jaisli, Patrick Laube, Sonja Trachsel, Pascal Ochsner, and Sarah Schuhmacher. Suitability evaluation system for the production and sourcing of agricultural commodities. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2018. Google Scholar
  5. Piotr Jankowski. Towards participatory geographic information systems for community-based environmental decision making. J. of env. management, 90(6):1966-1971, 2009. Google Scholar
  6. Dionysis Latinopoulos and K Kechagia. A GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation for wind farm site selection. A regional scale application in greece. Renewable Energy, 78:550-560, 2015. Google Scholar
  7. Jacek Malczewski. GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature. Int. J. of Geographical Information Science, 20(7):703-726, 2006. Google Scholar
  8. Jacek Malczewski and Claus Rinner. Multicriteria decision analysis in geographic information science. Springer, 2016. Google Scholar
  9. Beni Rohrbach, Patrick Laube, and Robert Weibel. Comparing multi-criteria evaluation and participatory mapping to projecting land use. Landscape and Urban Planning, 176:38-50, 2018. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail