License
When quoting this document, please refer to the following
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2018.1
URL: http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2018/9747/
Go to the corresponding OASIcs Volume Portal


Wilhelm, Reinhard

Mixed Feelings About Mixed Criticality (Invited Paper)

pdf-format:
OASIcs-WCET-2018-1.pdf (0.5 MB)


Abstract

I point to some challenges for WCET analysis offered in the transition to integrated mixed-criticality systems (MCSs) and to multi-core platforms, claim that proposed certification standards are inadequate, show that the MCS model heavily used by the scheduling community is fraught, and clarify why the traditional abstract interface between WCET analysis and schedulability analysis is obsolete. A central point is the insistence on sound approaches. I give a detailed account of how the most rigid certification procedures, those of the avionics domain, are satisfied, to defend the validity of my claims.

BibTeX - Entry

@InProceedings{wilhelm:OASIcs:2018:9747,
  author =	{Reinhard Wilhelm},
  title =	{{Mixed Feelings About Mixed Criticality (Invited Paper)}},
  booktitle =	{18th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time  Analysis (WCET 2018)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:9},
  series =	{OpenAccess Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-073-6},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{63},
  editor =	{Florian Brandner},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl--Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2018/9747},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2018.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: WCET analysis, mixed criticality systems, multi-core platforms, scheduling, schedulability}
}

Keywords: WCET analysis, mixed criticality systems, multi-core platforms, scheduling, schedulability
Seminar: 18th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2018)
Issue Date: 2018
Date of publication: 20.09.2018


DROPS-Home | Fulltext Search | Imprint | Privacy Published by LZI