Directed Hypercube Routing, a Generalized Lehman-Ron Theorem, and Monotonicity Testing

Authors Deeparnab Chakrabarty , C. Seshadhri



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.34.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.93 MB
  • 15 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Deeparnab Chakrabarty
  • Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
C. Seshadhri
  • University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA

Cite As Get BibTex

Deeparnab Chakrabarty and C. Seshadhri. Directed Hypercube Routing, a Generalized Lehman-Ron Theorem, and Monotonicity Testing. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 34:1-34:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.34

Abstract

Motivated by applications to monotonicity testing, Lehman and Ron (JCTA, 2001) proved the existence of a collection of vertex disjoint paths between comparable sub-level sets in the directed hypercube. The main technical contribution of this paper is a new proof method that yields a generalization of their theorem: we prove the existence of two edge-disjoint collections of vertex disjoint paths. Our main conceptual contributions are conjectures on directed hypercube flows with simultaneous vertex and edge capacities of which our generalized Lehman-Ron theorem is a special case. We show that these conjectures imply directed isoperimetric theorems, and in particular, the robust directed Talagrand inequality due to Khot, Minzer, and Safra (SIAM J. on Comp, 2018). These isoperimetric inequalities, that relate the directed surface area (of a set in the hypercube) to its distance to monotonicity, have been crucial in obtaining the best monotonicity testers for Boolean functions. We believe our conjectures pave the way towards combinatorial proofs of these directed isoperimetry theorems.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Streaming, sublinear and near linear time algorithms
  • Theory of computation → Randomness, geometry and discrete structures
Keywords
  • Monotonicity testing
  • isoperimetric inequalities
  • hypercube routing

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Nir Ailon and Bernard Chazelle. Information theory in property testing and monotonicity testing in higher dimension. Information and Computation, 204(11):1704-1717, 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IC.2006.06.001.
  2. Nir Ailon, Bernard Chazelle, Seshadhri Comandur, and Ding Liu. Estimating the distance to a monotone function. Random Structures Algorithms, 31(3):371-383, 2007. Prelim. version in Proc., RANDOM 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/RSA.20167.
  3. Paul Bastide, Carla Groenland, Hugo Jacob, and Tom Johnston. Exact antichain saturation numbers via a generalisation of a result of lehman-ron. Combinatorial Theory, 4(1), 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.5070/C64163848.
  4. Aleksandrs Belovs and Eric Blais. A polynomial lower bound for testing monotonicity. SIAM Journal on Computing (SICOMP), 50(3):406-433, 2021. Prelim. version in Proc., STOC 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1097006.
  5. Piotr Berman, Sofya Raskhodnikova, and Grigory Yaroslavtsev. L_p-testing. In Proceedings, ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 2014. Google Scholar
  6. Arnab Bhattacharyya. A note on the distance to monotonicity of boolean functions. Technical Report 012, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC), 2008. Google Scholar
  7. Arnab Bhattacharyya, Elena Grigorescu, Madhav Jha, Kyoming Jung, Sofya Raskhodnikova, and David Woodruff. Lower bounds for local monotonicity reconstruction from transitive-closure spanners. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics (SIDMA), 26(2):618-646, 2012. Prelim. version in Proc., RANDOM 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/100808186.
  8. Hadley Black, Deeparnab Chakrabarty, and C. Seshadhri. A o(d)⋅polylog(n) monotonicity tester for Boolean functions over the hypergrid [n]^d. In Proceedings, ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 2018. Google Scholar
  9. Hadley Black, Deeparnab Chakrabarty, and C. Seshadhri. Domain reduction: A o(d) tester for boolean functions in d-dimensions. In Proceedings, ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 2020. Google Scholar
  10. Hadley Black, Deeparnab Chakrabarty, and C. Seshadhri. A d^1/2+o(1) monotonicity tester for boolean functions on d-dimensional hypergrids. In Proceedings, IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2023. Google Scholar
  11. Hadley Black, Deeparnab Chakrabarty, and C. Seshadhri. Directed isoperimetric theorems for boolean functions on the hypergrid and an Õ(n√d) monotonicity tester. In Proceedings, ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 2023. Google Scholar
  12. Hadley Black, Iden Kalemaj, and Sofya Raskhodnikova. Isoperimetric inequalities for real-valued functions with applications to monotonicity testing. arXiv, abs/2011.09441, 2020. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.09441.
  13. Eric Blais, Joshua Brody, and Kevin Matulef. Property testing lower bounds via communication complexity. Computational Complexity, 21(2):311-358, 2012. Prelim. version in Proc., CCC 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/S00037-012-0040-X.
  14. Eric Blais, Sofya Raskhodnikova, and Grigory Yaroslavtsev. Lower bounds for testing properties of functions over hypergrid domains. In Proceedings, IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC), 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/CCC.2014.38.
  15. Mark Braverman, Subhash Khot, Guy Kindler, and Dor Minzer. Improved monotonicity testers via hypercube embeddings. In Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science (ITCS), pages 25:1-25:24, 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPICS.ITCS.2023.25.
  16. Jop Briët, Sourav Chakraborty, David García Soriano, and Ari Matsliah. Monotonicity testing and shortest-path routing on the cube. Combinatorica, 32(1):35-53, 2012. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/S00493-012-2765-1.
  17. Deeparnab Chakrabarty, Kashyap Dixit, Madhav Jha, and C Seshadhri. Property testing on product distributions: Optimal testers for bounded derivative properties. ACM Trans. on Algorithms (TALG), 13(2):1-30, 2017. Prelim. version in Proc., SODA 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3039241.
  18. Deeparnab Chakrabarty and C. Seshadhri. Optimal bounds for monotonicity and Lipschitz testing over hypercubes and hypergrids. In Proceedings, ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2488608.2488661.
  19. Deeparnab Chakrabarty and C. Seshadhri. An o(n) monotonicity tester for Boolean functions over the hypercube. SIAM Journal on Computing (SICOMP), 45(2):461-472, 2014. Prelim. version in Proc., STOC 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/13092770X.
  20. Xi Chen, Anindya De, Rocco A. Servedio, and Li-Yang Tan. Boolean function monotonicity testing requires (almost) O(n^1/2) non-adaptive queries. In Proceedings, ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 2015. Google Scholar
  21. Xi Chen, Rocco A. Servedio, and Li-Yang. Tan. New algorithms and lower bounds for monotonicity testing. In Proceedings, IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2014. Google Scholar
  22. Xi Chen, Erik Waingarten, and Jinyu Xie. Beyond Talagrand: New lower bounds for testing monotonicity and unateness. In Proceedings, ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 2017. Google Scholar
  23. William Cook, William Cunningham, William Pulleybank, and Alexander Schrijver. Combinatorial Optimization. Wiley Interscience Series, 1998. Google Scholar
  24. Yevgeny Dodis, Oded Goldreich, Eric Lehman, Sofya Raskhodnikova, Dana Ron, and Alex Samorodnitsky. Improved testing algorithms for monotonicity. Proceedings, International Workshop on Randomization and Computation (RANDOM), 1999. Google Scholar
  25. Funda Ergun, Sampath Kannan, Ravi Kumar, Ronitt Rubinfeld, and Mahesh Viswanathan. Spot-checkers. J. Comput. System Sci., 60(3):717-751, 2000. Prelim. version in Proc., STOC 1998. URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/JCSS.1999.1692.
  26. Shahar Fattal and Dana Ron. Approximating the distance to monotonicity in high dimensions. ACM Trans. on Algorithms (TALG), 6(3), 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1798596.1798605.
  27. Yuval Filmus, Hamed Hatami, Steven Heilman, Elchanan Mossel, Ryan O’Donnell, Sushant Sachdeva, Andrew Wan, and Karl Wimmer. Real analysis in computer science: A collection of open problems. https://simons.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/openprobsmerged.pdf, 2014.
  28. Eldar Fischer. On the strength of comparisons in property testing. Information and Computation, 189(1):107-116, 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IC.2003.09.003.
  29. Eldar Fischer, Eric Lehman, Ilan Newman, Sofya Raskhodnikova, and Ronitt Rubinfeld. Monotonicity testing over general poset domains. Proceedings, ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 2002. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/509907.509977.
  30. O. Goldreich, S. Goldwasser, and S. Ron. A note of testing monotonicity, 1997. Technical report. URL: https://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~oded/p_testMON.html.
  31. Oded Goldreich, Shafi Goldwasser, Eric Lehman, Dana Ron, and Alex Samordinsky. Testing monotonicity. Combinatorica, 20:301-337, 2000. Prelim. version in Proc., FOCS 1998, with authors Goldreich, Goldwasser, Lehman, and Ron. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/S004930070011.
  32. Shirley Halevy and Eyal Kushilevitz. Distribution-free property testing. Proceedings, International Workshop on Randomization and Computation (RANDOM), 2003. Google Scholar
  33. Shirley Halevy and Eyal Kushilevitz. Testing monotonicity over graph products. Random Structures Algorithms, 33(1):44-67, 2008. Prelim. version in Proc., ICALP 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/RSA.20211.
  34. Nathaniel Harms and Yuichi Yoshida. Downsampling for testing and learning in product distributions. In Proceedings, International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP), volume 229, pages 71:1-71:19, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPICS.ICALP.2022.71.
  35. Subhash Khot, Dor Minzer, and Muli Safra. On monotonicity testing and boolean isoperimetric-type theorems. SIAM Journal on Computing, 47(6):2238-2276, 2018. Prelim. version in Proc., FOCS 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1065872.
  36. Eric Lehman and Dana Ron. On disjoint chains of subsets. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 94(2):399-404, 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/JCTA.2000.3148.
  37. Ramesh Krishnan S. Pallavoor, Sofya Raskhodnikova, and Erik Waingarten. Approximating the distance to monotonicity of boolean functions. Random Structures Algorithms, 60(2):233-260, 2022. Prelim. version in Proc., SODA 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/RSA.21029.
  38. Sofya Raskhodnikova. Monotonicity testing. Masters Thesis, MIT, 1999. Google Scholar
  39. Dana Ron, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Muli Safra, Alex Samorodnitsky, and Omri Weinstein. Approximating the influence of monotone boolean functions in O(√n) query complexity. ACM Trans. Comput. Theory, 4(4):11:1-11:12, 2012. Prelim. version in Proc., RANDOM 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2382559.2382562.
  40. Michael E. Saks and C. Seshadhri. Parallel monotonicity reconstruction. In Proceedings, ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 2008. URL: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1347082.1347187.
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail