eng
Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik
Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics
1868-8969
2024-08-19
10:1
10:20
10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2024.10
article
New Lower Bounds for Polynomial Calculus over Non-Boolean Bases
Dahiya, Yogesh
1
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7338-1762
Mahajan, Meena
1
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9116-4398
Mouli, Sasank
2
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4134-7445
The Institute of Mathematical Sciences (A CI of Homi Bhabha National Institute), Chennai, India
Indian Institute of Technology Indore, India
In this paper, we obtain new size lower bounds for proofs in the Polynomial Calculus (PC) proof system, in two different settings.
- When the Boolean variables are encoded using ±1 (as opposed to 0,1): We establish a lifting theorem using an asymmetric gadget G, showing that for an unsatisfiable formula F, the lifted formula F∘G requires PC size 2^{Ω(d)}, where d is the degree required to refute F. Our lower bound does not depend on the number of variables n, and holds over every field. The only previously known size lower bounds in this setting were established quite recently in [Sokolov, STOC 2020] using lifting with another (symmetric) gadget. The size lower bound there is 2^{Ω((d-d₀)²/n)} (where d₀ is the degree of the initial equations arising from the formula), and is shown to hold only over the reals.
- When the PC refutation proceeds over a finite field 𝔽_p and is allowed to use extension variables: We show that there is an unsatisfiable AC⁰[p] formula with N variables for which any PC refutation using N^{1+ε(1-δ)} extension variables, each of arity at most N^{1-ε} and size at most N^c, must have size exp(Ω(N^{εδ}/polylog N)). Our proof achieves these bounds by an XOR-ification of the generalised PHP^{m,r}_n formulas from [Razborov, CC 1998].
The only previously known lower bounds for PC in this setting are those obtained in [Impagliazzo-Mouli-Pitassi, CCC 2023]; in those bounds the number of extension variables is required to be sub-quadratic, and their arity is restricted to logarithmic in the number of original variables. Our result generalises these, and demonstrates a tradeoff between the number and the arity of extension variables. Since our tautology is represented by a small AC⁰[p] formula, our results imply lower bounds for a reasonably strong fragment of AC⁰[p]-Frege.
https://drops.dagstuhl.de/storage/00lipics/lipics-vol305-sat2024/LIPIcs.SAT.2024.10/LIPIcs.SAT.2024.10.pdf
Proof Complexity
Polynomial Calculus
degree
Fourier basis
extension variables