<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-26T17:19:47Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="10614" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:10614</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:46:17Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Restricted Max-Min Allocation: Approximation and Integrality Gap</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Cheng, Siu-Wing</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Mao, Yuchen</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>fair allocation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>configuration LP</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>approximation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>integrality gap</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Asadpour, Feige, and Saberi proved that the integrality gap of the configuration LP for the restricted max-min allocation problem is at most 4. However, their proof does not give a polynomial-time approximation algorithm. A lot of efforts have been devoted to designing an efficient algorithm whose approximation ratio can match this upper bound for the integrality gap. In ICALP 2018, we present a (6 + delta)-approximation algorithm where delta can be any positive constant, and there is still a gap of roughly 2. In this paper, we narrow the gap significantly by proposing a (4+delta)-approximation algorithm where delta can be any positive constant. The approximation ratio is with respect to the optimal value of the configuration LP, and the running time is poly(m,n)* n^{poly(1/(delta))} where n is the number of players and m is the number of resources. We also improve the upper bound for the integrality gap of the configuration LP to 3 + 21/26 =~ 3.808.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Siu-Wing Cheng and Yuchen Mao</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2019</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 132, 46th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2019)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.38</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-106143</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.38</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
