<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-21T14:18:37Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="10964" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:10964</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:46:56Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Approximating Activation Edge-Cover and Facility Location Problems</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Nutov, Zeev</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Kortsarz, Guy</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Shalom, Eli</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>generalized min-covering problem</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>activation edge-cover</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>facility location</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>minimum power</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>approximation algorithm</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>What approximation ratio can we achieve for the Facility Location problem if whenever a client u connects to a facility v, the opening cost of v is at most theta times the service cost of u? We show that this and many other problems are a particular case of the Activation Edge-Cover problem. Here we are given a multigraph G=(V,E), a set R subseteq V of terminals, and thresholds {t^e_u,t^e_v} for each uv-edge e in E. The goal is to find an assignment a={a_v:v in V} to the nodes minimizing sum_{v in V} a_v, such that the edge set E_a={e=uv: a_u &gt;= t^e_u, a_v &gt;= t^e_v} activated by a covers R. We obtain ratio 1+max_{x&gt;=1}(ln x)/(1+x/theta)~= ln theta - ln ln theta for the problem, where theta is a problem parameter. This result is based on a simple generic algorithm for the problem of minimizing a sum of a decreasing and a sub-additive set functions, which is of independent interest. As an application, we get the same ratio for the above variant of {Facility Location}. If for each facility all service costs are identical then we show a better ratio 1+max_{k in N}(H_k-1)/(1+k/theta), where H_k=sum_{i=1}^k 1/i. For the Min-Power Edge-Cover problem we improve the ratio 1.406 of [Calinescu et al, 2019] (achieved by iterative randomized rounding) to 1.2785. For unit thresholds we improve the ratio 73/60~=1.217 of [Calinescu et al, 2019] to 1555/1347~=1.155.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Zeev Nutov and Guy Kortsarz and Eli Shalom</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2019</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 138, 44th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2019)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2019.20</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-109642</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2019.20</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
