<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-20T15:08:01Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="11682" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:11682</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:27:10Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Software Protection Decision Support and Evaluation Methodologies (Dagstuhl Seminar 19331)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>De Sutter, Bjorn</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Collberg, Christian</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Dalla Preda, Mila</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Wyseur, Brecht</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Benchmarks</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Decision Support Systems</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Evaluation Methodology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>man-at-the-end attacks</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>metrics</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>predictive models</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>reverse engineering and tampering</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>software protection</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 19331 ``Software Protection Decision Support and Evaluation Methodologies''. The seminar is situated in the domain of software protection against so-called man-at-the-end attacks, in which attackers have white-box access to the software that embeds valuable assets with security requirements such as confidentiality and integrity. The attackers try to compromise those by reverse-engineering the software and by tampering with it. Within this domain, the seminar focused mainly on three aspects: 1) how to evaluate newly proposed protections and attackers thereon; 2) how to create an appropriate benchmark suite to be used in such evaluations; 3) how to build decision support to aid users of protection tool with the selection of appropriate protections. The major outcomes are a structure for a white-paper on software protection evaluation methodologies, with some concrete input collected on the basis of four case studies explored during the seminar, and a plan for creating a software protection benchmark suite.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Bjorn De Sutter and Christian Collberg and Mila Dalla Preda and Brecht Wyseur</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2019</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 9, Issue 8 (2020)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>Article</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagRep.9.8.1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-116825</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagRep.9.8.1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
