<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-02T16:29:49Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="11812" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:11812</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:48:50Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Lower Bounds for Shoreline Searching With 2 or More Robots</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Acharjee, Sumi</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Georgiou, Konstantinos</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Kundu, Somnath</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Srinivasan, Akshaya</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>2-Dimensional Search</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Online Algorithms</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Competitive Analysis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Lower Bounds</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Searching for a line on the plane with n unit speed robots is a classic online problem that dates back to the 50’s, and for which competitive ratio upper bounds are known for every n ≥ 1, see [Baeza-Yates and Schott, 1995]. In this work we improve the best lower bound known for n=2 robots [Baeza-Yates and Schott, 1995] from 1.5993 to 3. Moreover we prove that the competitive ratio is at least √{3} for n=3 robots, and at least 1/cos ({π/n}) for n ≥ 4 robots. Our lower bounds match the best upper bounds known for n ≥ 4, hence resolving these cases. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first lower bounds proven for the cases n ≥ 3 of this several decades old problem.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Sumi Acharjee and Konstantinos Georgiou and Somnath Kundu and Akshaya Srinivasan</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2020</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 153, 23rd International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2019)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2019.26</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-118121</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2019.26</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
