<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-02T03:08:23Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="11870" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:11870</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:48:53Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>NP-Completeness, Proof Systems, and Disjoint NP-Pairs</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Dose, Titus</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Glaßer, Christian</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>NP-complete</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>propositional proof system</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>disjoint NP-pair</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>oracle</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>The article investigates the relation between three well-known hypotheses.  &#13;
- H_{union}: the union of disjoint ≤^p_m-complete sets for NP is ≤^p_m-complete &#13;
- H_{opps}: there exist optimal propositional proof systems &#13;
- H_{cpair}: there exist ≤^{pp}_m-complete disjoint NP-pairs  The following results are obtained:  &#13;
- The hypotheses are pairwise independent under relativizable proofs, except for the known implication H_{opps} ⇒ H_{cpair}. &#13;
- An answer to Pudlák’s question for an oracle relative to which ¬H_{cpair}, ¬H_{opps}, and UP has ≤^p_m-complete sets. &#13;
- The converse of Köbler, Messner, and Torán’s implication NEE ∩ TALLY ⊆ coNEE ⇒ H_{opps} fails relative to an oracle, where NEE =^{df} NTIME(2^O(2ⁿ)). &#13;
- New characterizations of H_{union} and two variants in terms of coNP-completeness and p-producibility of the set of hard formulas of propositional proof systems.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Titus Dose and Christian Glaßer</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2020</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 154, 37th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2020)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2020.9</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-118707</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2020.9</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
