<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-25T02:34:11Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="12077" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:12077</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:49:17Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Indexing Compressed Text: A Tale of Time and Space (Invited Talk)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Prezza, Nicola</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Compressed Text Indexing</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Text indexing is a classical algorithmic problem that has been studied for over four decades. The earliest optimal-time solution to the problem, the suffix tree [Weiner, 1973], dates back to 1973 and requires up to two orders of magnitude more space than the text to be stored. In the year 2000, two breakthrough works [Grossi and Vitter, 2000; Ferragina and Manzini, 2000] showed that this space overhead is not necessary: both the index and the text can be stored in a space proportional to the text’s entropy. These contributions had an enormous impact in bioinformatics: nowadays, the two most widely-used DNA aligners employ compressed indexes [Li and Durbin, 2009; Langmead et al., 2009]. In recent years, it became apparent that entropy had reached its limits: modern datasets (for example, collections of thousands of human genomes) are extremely large but very repetitive and, by its very definition, entropy cannot compress repetitive texts [S. Kreft and G. Navarro, 2013]. To overcome this problem, a new generation of indexes based on dictionary compressors (for example, LZ77 and run-length BWT) emerged [S. Kreft and G. Navarro, 2013; Gagie et al., 2020; F. Claude and G. Navarro, 2012], together with generalizations of the indexing problem to labeled graphs [Ferragina et al., 2009; Sirén et al., 2014; Travis Gagie et al., 2017]. This talk is a short and friendly survey of the landmarks of this fascinating path that took us from suffix trees to the most modern compressed indexes on labeled graphs.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Nicola Prezza</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2020</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 160, 18th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2020)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2020.3</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-120772</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2020.3</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
