<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-11T21:31:33Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="1214" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:1214</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:07:40Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>A Method for Reasoning about other Agents' Beliefs from Observations</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Nittka, Alexander</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Booth, Richard</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Belief revision</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>iterated revision</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>non-prioritised revision</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>non-monotonic reasoning</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>rational closure</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>rational explanation</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Traditional work in belief revision deals with the question of what an  agent should believe upon receiving new information.  We will give an  overview about what can be concluded about an agent based on an  observation of its belief revision behaviour. The observation contains  partial information about the revision inputs received by the agent and  its beliefs upon receiving them. We will sketch a method for reasoning  about past and future beliefs of the agent and predicting which inputs it  accepts and rejects. The focus of this talk will be on different degrees  of incompleteness of the observation and variants of the general question we are able to deal with.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Alexander Nittka and Richard Booth</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2007</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7351, Formal Models of Belief Change in Rational Agents (2007)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.07351.6</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-12148</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.07351.6</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
