<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-21T14:16:54Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="1248" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:1248</identifier>
        <datestamp>2025-09-25T07:01:28Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Termination of Programs using Term Rewriting and SAT Solving</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Giesl, Jürgen</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Schneider-Kamp, Peter</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Thiemann, René</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Swiderski, Stephan</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Nguyen, Manh Thang</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>De Schreye, Daniel</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Serebrenik, Alexander</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Termination</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Term Rewriting</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Haskell</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Prolog</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>SAT Solving</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>There are many powerful techniques for automated termination analysis of&#13;
term rewrite systems (TRSs). However, up to now they have hardly been used &#13;
for real programming languages. In this talk, we describe recent results &#13;
which permit the application of existing techniques from term rewriting &#13;
in order to prove termination of programs. We discuss two possible approaches:&#13;
&#13;
1. One could translate programs into TRSs and then use existing tools to &#13;
   verify termination of the resulting TRSs.&#13;
&#13;
2. One could adapt TRS-techniques to the respective programming languages&#13;
   in order to analyze programs directly. &#13;
&#13;
We present such approaches for the functional language Haskell and the logic&#13;
language Prolog. Our results have been implemented in the termination provers&#13;
AProVE and Polytool. In order to handle termination problems resulting &#13;
from real programs, these provers had to be coupled with modern SAT solvers,&#13;
since the automation of the TRS-termination techniques had to&#13;
improve significantly. Our resulting termination analyzers are currently&#13;
the most powerful ones for Haskell and Prolog.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Jürgen Giesl and Peter Schneider-Kamp and René Thiemann and Stephan Swiderski and Manh Thang Nguyen and Daniel De Schreye and Alexander Serebrenik</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2007</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7401, Deduction and Decision Procedures (2007)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.07401.7</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-12481</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.07401.7</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
