<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-22T11:40:58Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="12579" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:12579</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:50:30Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Finding Small Satisfying Assignments Faster Than Brute Force: A Fine-Grained Perspective into Boolean Constraint Satisfaction</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Künnemann, Marvin</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Marx, Dániel</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Fine-grained complexity theory</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>algorithmic classification theorem</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>multivariate algorithms and complexity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>constraint satisfaction problems</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>satisfiability</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>To study the question under which circumstances small solutions can be found faster than by exhaustive search (and by how much), we study the fine-grained complexity of Boolean constraint satisfaction with size constraint exactly k. More precisely, we aim to determine, for any finite constraint family, the optimal running time f(k)n^g(k) required to find satisfying assignments that set precisely k of the n variables to 1. &#13;
Under central hardness assumptions on detecting cliques in graphs and 3-uniform hypergraphs, we give an almost tight characterization of g(k) into four regimes:  &#13;
1) Brute force is essentially best-possible, i.e., g(k) = (1 ± o(1))k, &#13;
2) the best algorithms are as fast as current k-clique algorithms, i.e., g(k) = (ω/3 ± o(1))k, &#13;
3) the exponent has sublinear dependence on k with g(k) ∈ [Ω(∛k), O(√k)], or &#13;
4) the problem is fixed-parameter tractable, i.e., g(k) = O(1). &#13;
This yields a more fine-grained perspective than a previous FPT/W[1]-hardness dichotomy (Marx, Computational Complexity 2005). Our most interesting technical contribution is a f(k)n^(4√k)-time algorithm for SubsetSum with precedence constraints parameterized by the target k - particularly the approach, based on generalizing a bound on the Frobenius coin problem to a setting with precedence constraints, might be of independent interest.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Marvin Künnemann and Dániel Marx</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2020</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 169, 35th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2020)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2020.27</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-125791</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2020.27</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
