<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-20T07:31:07Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="12656" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:12656</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:51:22Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Approximating Requirement Cut via a Configuration LP</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Schwartz, Roy</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Sharoni, Yotam</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Approximation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Requirement Cut</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Sparsest Cut</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Metric Embedding</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We consider the {Requirement Cut} problem, where given an undirected graph G = (V,E) equipped with non-negative edge weights c:E → R_{+}, and g groups of vertices X₁,…,X_{g} ⊆ V each equipped with a requirement r_i, the goal is to find a collection of edges F ⊆ E, with total minimum weight, such that once F is removed from G in the resulting graph every X_{i} is broken into at least r_{i} connected components. {Requirement Cut} captures multiple classic cut problems in graphs, e.g., {Multicut}, {Multiway Cut}, {Min k-Cut}, {Steiner k-Cut}, {Steiner Multicut}, and {Multi-Multiway Cut}. Nagarajan and Ravi [Algoritmica`10] presented an approximation of O(log{n}log{R}) for the problem, which was subsequently improved to O(log{g} log{k}) by Gupta, Nagarajan and Ravi [Operations Research Letters`10] (here R = ∑ _{i = 1}^g r_i and k = |∪ _{i = 1}^g X_i |). We present an approximation of O(Xlog{R} √{log{k}}log{log{k}}) for {Requirement Cut} (here X = max _{i = 1,…,g} {|X_i|}). Our approximation in general is incomparable to the above mentioned previous results, however when all groups are not too large, i.e., X = o((√{log{k}}log{g})/(log{R}log{log{k}})), it is better. Our algorithm is based on a new configuration linear programming relaxation for the problem, which is accompanied by a remarkably simple randomized rounding procedure.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Roy Schwartz and Yotam Sharoni</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2020</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 176, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2020)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2020.53</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-126560</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2020.53</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
