<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-25T03:03:07Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="1337" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:1337</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:32:57Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>On the Complexity of the Interlace Polynomial</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Bläser, Markus</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Hoffmann, Christian</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Computational complexity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>approximation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>interlace polynomial</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>independent set polynomial</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>graph transformation</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We consider the two-variable interlace polynomial introduced by&#13;
   Arratia, Bollob`as and Sorkin (2004).  We develop two graph&#13;
   transformations which allow us to derive point-to-point reductions&#13;
   for the interlace polynomial.  Exploiting these reductions we&#13;
   obtain new results concerning the computational complexity of&#13;
   evaluating the interlace polynomial at a fixed point.  Regarding&#13;
   exact evaluation, we prove that the interlace polynomial is #P-hard&#13;
   to evaluate at every point of the plane, except at one line, where&#13;
   it is trivially polynomial time computable, and four lines and two&#13;
   points, where the complexity mostly is still open.  This solves a&#13;
   problem posed by Arratia, Bollob`as and Sorkin (2004).  In&#13;
   particular, we observe that three specializations of the&#13;
   two-variable interlace polynomial, the vertex-nullity interlace&#13;
   polynomial, the vertex-rank interlace polynomial and the&#13;
   independent set polynomial, are almost everywhere #P-hard to&#13;
   evaluate, too.  For the independent set polynomial, our reductions&#13;
   allow us to prove that it is even hard to approximate at every&#13;
   point except at $-1$ and~$0$.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Markus Bläser and Christian Hoffmann</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2008</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 1, 25th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (2008)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2008.1337</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-13378</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2008.1337</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
