<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-21T23:20:45Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="13589" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:13589</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:52:23Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Time-Space Lower Bounds for Simulating Proof Systems with Quantum and Randomized Verifiers</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Mudigonda, Abhijit S.</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Williams, R. Ryan</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Time-space tradeoffs</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>lower bounds</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>QMA</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>A line of work initiated by Fortnow in 1997 has proven model-independent time-space lower bounds for the SAT problem and related problems within the polynomial-time hierarchy. For example, for the SAT problem, the state-of-the-art is that the problem cannot be solved by random-access machines in n^c time and n^o(1) space simultaneously for c &lt; 2cos(π/7) ≈ 1.801. &#13;
We extend this lower bound approach to the quantum and randomized domains. Combining Grover’s algorithm with components from SAT time-space lower bounds, we show that there are problems verifiable in O(n) time with quantum Merlin-Arthur protocols that cannot be solved in n^c time and n^o(1) space simultaneously for c &lt; (3+√3)/2 ≈ 2.366, a super-quadratic time lower bound. This result and the prior work on SAT can both be viewed as consequences of a more general formula for time lower bounds against small-space algorithms, whose asymptotics we study in full. &#13;
We also show lower bounds against randomized algorithms: there are problems verifiable in O(n) time with (classical) Merlin-Arthur protocols that cannot be solved in n^c randomized time and O(log n) space simultaneously for c &lt; 1.465, improving a result of Diehl. For quantum Merlin-Arthur protocols, the lower bound in this setting can be improved to c &lt; 1.5.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Abhijit S. Mudigonda and R. Ryan Williams</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2021</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 185, 12th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2021)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2021.50</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-135897</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2021.50</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
