<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-15T13:09:24Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="1386" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:1386</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:07:30Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Variational Bayes via Propositionalization</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Sato, Taisuke</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Kameya, Yoshitaka</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Kurihara, Kenichi</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Variational Bayes</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>propositionalized probability computation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>PRISM</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We propose a unified approach to VB (variational Bayes) in&#13;
symbolic-statistical  modeling  via  propositionalization.&#13;
By  propositionalization we  mean, broadly,  expressing and&#13;
computing  probabilistic  models  such  as  BNs  (Bayesian&#13;
networks) and PCFGs  (probabilistic context free grammars)&#13;
in   terms   of   propositional   logic   that   considers&#13;
propositional variables as binary random variables.&#13;
&#13;
Our  proposal  is motivated  by  three observations.   The&#13;
first  one  is   that  PPC  (propostionalized  probability&#13;
computation), i.e.  probability computation formalized in&#13;
a propositional setting, has  turned out to be general and&#13;
efficient    when    variable    values    are    sparsely&#13;
interdependent.   Examples include  (discrete)  BNs, PCFGs&#13;
and more generally PRISM  which is a Turing complete logic&#13;
programming language with EM learning ability we have been&#13;
developing,  and computes probabilities  using graphically&#13;
represented AND/OR boolean formulas.  Efficiency of PPC is&#13;
classically testified  by the Inside-Outside  algorithm in&#13;
the case of PCFGs and by recent PPC approaches in the case&#13;
of BNs such  as the one by Darwiche  et al. that exploits&#13;
$0$ probability and  CSI (context specific independence).&#13;
Dechter  et  al. also  revealed  that  PPC  is a  general&#13;
computation scheme for BNs  by their formulation of AND/OR&#13;
search spaces.&#13;
&#13;
Second of all, while VB  has been around for sometime as a&#13;
practically effective approach  to Bayesian modeling, it's&#13;
use is still somewhat  restricted to simple models such as&#13;
BNs and HMMs (hidden  Markov models) though its usefulness&#13;
is  established  through a  variety  of applications  from&#13;
model selection  to prediction.  On  the other hand  it is&#13;
already proved  that VB  can be extended  to PCFGs  and is&#13;
efficiently implementable  using dynamic programming. Note&#13;
that PCFGs are just one class of PPC and much more general&#13;
PPC is realized  by PRISM. Accordingly if VB is extened to&#13;
PRISM's PPC,  we will obtain VB  for general probabilistic&#13;
models, far wider than BNs and PCFGs.&#13;
&#13;
The last observation is  that once VB becomes available in&#13;
PRISM, it saves us a lot  of time and energy.  First we do&#13;
not have  to derive  a new VB  algorithm from  scratch for&#13;
each model and implement it.  All we have to do is just to&#13;
write a  probabilistic model at predicate  level. The rest&#13;
of  work will be  carried out  automatically in  a unified&#13;
manner by the PRISM system as it happens in the case of EM&#13;
learning.  Deriving  and implementing a VB  algorithm is a&#13;
tedious error-prone process,  and ensuring its correctness&#13;
would be difficult  beyond PCFGs without formal semantics.&#13;
&#13;
PRISM  augmented with  VB will  completely  eliminate such&#13;
needs and  make it easy  to explore and test  new Bayesian&#13;
models by  helping the user cope with  data sparseness and&#13;
avoid over-fitting.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Taisuke Sato and Yoshitaka Kameya and Kenichi Kurihara</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2008</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7161, Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis (2008)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.10</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-13860</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.10</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
