2026-08-15T09:33:19Z https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai

oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:14087 2024-03-06T10:53:26Z ddc:004 open_access

Relaxed Locally Correctable Codes with Improved Parameters Asadi, Vahid R. Shinkar, Igor Algorithmic coding theory consistency test using random walk Reed-Muller code relaxed locally decodable codes relaxed locally correctable codes Locally decodable codes (LDCs) are error-correcting codes C: Σ^k → Σⁿ that admit a local decoding algorithm that recovers each individual bit of the message by querying only a few bits from a noisy codeword. An important question in this line of research is to understand the optimal trade-off between the query complexity of LDCs and their block length. Despite importance of these objects, the best known constructions of constant query LDCs have super-polynomial length, and there is a significant gap between the best constructions and the known lower bounds in terms of the block length. For many applications it suffices to consider the weaker notion of relaxed LDCs (RLDCs), which allows the local decoding algorithm to abort if by querying a few bits it detects that the input is not a codeword. This relaxation turned out to allow decoding algorithms with constant query complexity for codes with almost linear length. Specifically, [{Ben-Sasson} et al., 2006] constructed a q-query RLDC that encodes a message of length k using a codeword of block length n = O_q(k^{1+O(1/√q)}) for any sufficiently large q, where O_q(⋅) hides some constant that depends only on q. In this work we improve the parameters of [{Ben-Sasson} et al., 2006] by constructing a q-query RLDC that encodes a message of length k using a codeword of block length O_q(k^{1+O(1/{q})}) for any sufficiently large q. This construction matches (up to a multiplicative constant factor) the lower bounds of [Jonathan Katz and Trevisan, 2000; Woodruff, 2007] for constant query LDCs, thus making progress toward understanding the gap between LDCs and RLDCs in the constant query regime. In fact, our construction extends to the stronger notion of relaxed locally correctable codes (RLCCs), introduced in [Tom Gur et al., 2018], where given a noisy codeword the correcting algorithm either recovers each individual bit of the codeword by only reading a small part of the input, or aborts if the input is detected to be corrupt. Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik Vahid R. Asadi and Igor Shinkar 2021 Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 198, 48th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2021) InProceedings Text doc-type:ResearchArticle publishedVersion application/pdf doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.18 urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-140878 https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.18 eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode