<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-23T06:31:04Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="1443" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:1443</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:07:53Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Robustness of Boolean operations on subdivision-surface models</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Jiang, Di</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Stewart, Neil</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Robustness</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>finite-precision arithmetic</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Boolean operations</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>subdivision surfaces</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>This work was presented in two parts at Dagstuhl seminar 08021.&#13;
 The two presentations described work in&#13;
progress, including a ``backward bound'' for a combined backward/forward&#13;
error analysis for the problem mentioned in the title.&#13;
&#13;
We seek rigorous proofs that representations of computed sets, produced by&#13;
algorithms to compute Boolean operations, are well formed, and that the&#13;
algorithms are correct. Such proofs should eventually take account of the use of&#13;
finite-precision arithmetic, although the proofs presented here do not.&#13;
&#13;
The representations studied are based on subdivision surfaces. Such&#13;
representations are being used more and more frequently  in place of trimmed&#13;
NURBS representations, and the robustness analysis for these new representations&#13;
is simpler than for trimmed NURBS.&#13;
&#13;
The particular subdivision-surface representation used is based on the Loop&#13;
subdivision scheme. The analysis is broken into three parts. First, it is&#13;
established that the input operands are well-formed two-dimensional manifolds&#13;
without boundary. This can be done with  existing methods.&#13;
Secondly, we introduce the so-called ``limit mesh'', and view the&#13;
limit meshes corresponding to the input sets as defining an approximate problem&#13;
in the sense of a backward error analysis. The presentations mentioned above&#13;
described a proof of the corresponding error bound. The third part of the&#13;
analysis corresponds to the ``forward bound'': this remains to be done.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Di Jiang and Neil Stewart</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2008</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8021, Numerical Validation in Current Hardware Architectures (2008)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.08021.17</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-14435</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.08021.17</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
