<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-24T03:28:34Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="14786" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:14786</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:54:38Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Deciding FO-Rewritability of Ontology-Mediated Queries in Linear Temporal Logic</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Ryzhikov, Vladislav</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Savateev, Yury</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Zakharyaschev, Michael</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Linear temporal logic</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>ontology-mediated query</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>first-order rewritability</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Our concern is the problem of determining the data complexity of answering an ontology-mediated query (OMQ) given in linear temporal logic LTL over (ℤ, &lt;) and deciding whether it is rewritable to an FO(&lt;)-query, possibly with extra predicates. First, we observe that, in line with the circuit complexity and FO-definability of regular languages, OMQ answering in AC⁰, ACC⁰ and NC¹ coincides with FO(&lt;,≡)-rewritability using unary predicates x ≡ 0 (mod n), FO(&lt;,MOD)-rewritability, and FO(RPR)-rewritability using relational primitive recursion, respectively. We then show that deciding FO(&lt;)-, FO(&lt;,≡)- and FO(&lt;,MOD)-rewritability of LTL OMQs is ExpSpace-complete, and that these problems become PSpace-complete for OMQs with a linear Horn ontology and an atomic query, and also a positive query in the cases of FO(&lt;)- and FO(&lt;,≡)-rewritability. Further, we consider FO(&lt;)-rewritability of OMQs with a binary-clause ontology and identify OMQ classes, for which deciding it is PSpace-, Π₂^p- and coNP-complete.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Vladislav Ryzhikov and Yury Savateev and Michael Zakharyaschev</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2021</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 206, 28th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME 2021)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2021.10</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-147867</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2021.10</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
