<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-22T07:15:43Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="15829" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:15829</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:56:17Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>The Aperiodic Domino Problem in Higher Dimension</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Callard, Antonin</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Hellouin de Menibus, Benjamin</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Subshift</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>periodicity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>aperiodicity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>domino problem</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>subshift of finite type</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>sofic subshift</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>effective subshift</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>tilings</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>computability</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>The classical Domino problem asks whether there exists a tiling in which none of the forbidden patterns given as input appear. In this paper, we consider the aperiodic version of the Domino problem: given as input a family of forbidden patterns, does it allow an aperiodic tiling? The input may correspond to a subshift of finite type, a sofic subshift or an effective subshift.&#13;
[Grandjean et al., 2018] proved that this problem is co-recursively enumerable (Π₀¹-complete) in dimension 2 for geometrical reasons. We show that it is much harder, namely analytic (Σ₁¹-complete), in higher dimension: d ≥ 4 in the finite type case, d ≥ 3 for sofic and effective subshifts. The reduction uses a subshift embedding universal computation and two additional dimensions to control periodicity.&#13;
This complexity jump is surprising for two reasons: first, it separates 2- and 3-dimensional subshifts, whereas most subshift properties are the same in dimension 2 and higher; second, it is unexpectedly large.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Antonin Callard and Benjamin Hellouin de Menibus</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2022</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 219, 39th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2022)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2022.19</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-158296</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2022.19</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
