<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-23T20:15:14Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="16002" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:16002</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:31:40Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Combining Embeddings and Rules for Fact Prediction (Invited Paper)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Boschin, Armand</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Jain, Nitisha</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Keretchashvili, Gurami</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Suchanek, Fabian</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Rule Mining</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Embeddings</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Knowledge Bases</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Deep Learning</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Knowledge bases are typically incomplete, meaning that they are missing information that we would expect to be there. Recent years have seen two main approaches to guess missing facts: Rule Mining and Knowledge Graph Embeddings. The first approach is symbolic, and finds rules such as "If two people are married, they most likely live in the same city". These rules can then be used to predict missing statements. Knowledge Graph Embeddings, on the other hand, are trained to predict missing facts for a knowledge base by mapping entities to a vector space. Each of these approaches has their strengths and weaknesses, and this article provides a survey of neuro-symbolic works that combine embeddings and rule mining approaches for fact prediction.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Armand Boschin and Nitisha Jain and Gurami Keretchashvili and Fabian Suchanek</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2022</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of OASIcs, Volume 99, International Research School in Artificial Intelligence in Bergen (AIB 2022)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/OASIcs.AIB.2022.4</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-160021</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.AIB.2022.4</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
