<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-12T00:10:21Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="16062" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:16062</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:56:52Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Sparse Euclidean Spanners with Tiny Diameter: A Tight Lower Bound</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Le, Hung</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Milenković, Lazar</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Solomon, Shay</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Euclidean spanners</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>hop-diameter</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>inverse-Ackermann</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>lower bounds</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>sparse spanners</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>In STOC'95 [ADMSS95] Arya et al. showed that any set of n points in R^d admits a (1+ε)-spanner with hop-diameter at most 2 (respectively, 3) and O(n log n) edges (resp., O(n log log n) edges). They also gave a general upper bound tradeoff of hop-diameter at most k and O(n α_k(n)) edges, for any k≥2. The function α_k is the inverse of a certain Ackermann-style function at the ⌊k/2⌋th level of the primitive recursive hierarchy, where α₀(n)=⌈n/2⌉, α₁(n)=⌈√n⌉, α₂(n)=⌈log n⌉, α₃(n)=⌈log log n⌉, α₄(n)=log^* n, α₅(n)=⌊1/2 log^*n⌋, .... Roughly speaking, for k≥2 the function α_{k} is close to ⌊(k-2)/2⌋-iterated log-star function, i.e., log with ⌊(k-2)/2⌋ stars. Also, α_{2α(n)+4}(n)≤4, where α(n) is the one-parameter inverse Ackermann function, which is an extremely slowly growing function.&#13;
Whether or not this tradeoff is tight has remained open, even for the cases k=2 and k=3. Two lower bounds are known: The first applies only to spanners with stretch 1 and the second is sub-optimal and applies only to sufficiently large (constant) values of k. In this paper we prove a tight lower bound for any constant k: For any fixed ε&gt;0, any (1+ε)-spanner for the uniform line metric with hop-diameter at most k must have at least Ω(n α_k(n)) edges.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Hung Le and Lazar Milenković and Shay Solomon</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2022</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 224, 38th International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2022)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2022.54</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-160629</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2022.54</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
