<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-20T05:59:46Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="1608" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:1608</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:07:57Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Abstraction, ontology and task-guidance for visual perception in robots</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Schlemmer, Matthias</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Vincze, Markus</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Abstraction</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>ontology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>task</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>vision</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>For solving recognition tasks in order to navigate in unknown environments&#13;
and to manipulate objects, humans seem to use at least the following crucial &#13;
capabilities: abstraction (for storing higher-level concepts of things), common &#13;
sense knowledge and prediction. Whereas the first and second provide the &#13;
basis for situated recognition, the second and third serve for pruning the &#13;
search space as it helps anticipating what (in an abstract sense) they will see&#13;
 next and where. The main goal of our current research is, how we could use &#13;
such a kind of "common sense world knowledge" for guiding visual perception&#13;
 and understanding scenes. Therefore, we are combining an owl-ontology &#13;
with the output of vision tools. The additional use of abstraction techniques &#13;
tries to establish the possibility of detecting higher level concepts, such as &#13;
arches composed of a variable number of parts. The goal is to finally find &#13;
concepts such as doors and tables in arbitrary scenes in order to arrive at a &#13;
generic recognition tool for home robots. The ontology should additionally &#13;
provide task-specific information about the things to detect.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Matthias Schlemmer and Markus Vincze</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2008</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8091, Logic and Probability for Scene Interpretation (2008)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.08091.2</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-16081</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.08091.2</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
