<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-21T23:59:38Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="16282" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:16282</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:57:08Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Cutting a Proof into Bite-Sized Chunks: Incrementally proving termination in higher-order term rewriting (Invited Talk)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Kop, Cynthia</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Termination</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Modularity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Higher-order term rewriting</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Dependency Pairs</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Algebra Interpretations</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>This paper discusses a number of methods to prove termination of higher-order term rewriting systems, with a particular focus on large systems. In first-order term rewriting, the dependency pair framework can be used to split up a large termination problem into multiple (much) smaller components that can be solved individually. This is important because a large problem may take exponentially longer to solve in one go than solving each of its components.&#13;
Unfortunately, while there are higher-order versions of several of these methods, they often fail to simplify a problem enough. Here, we will explore some of these techniques and their limitations, and discuss what else can be done to incrementally build a termination proof for higher-order systems.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Cynthia Kop</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2022</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 228, 7th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2022)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2022.1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-162827</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2022.1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
