<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-20T05:06:47Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="1697" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:1697</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:08:14Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Breaking the $\epsilon$-Soundness Bound of the Linearity Test over GF(2)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Kaufman, Tali</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Litsyn, Simon</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Xie, Ning</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Linearity test</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Fourier analysis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>coding theory</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>For Boolean functions that are $epsilon$-far from the set of linear functions, &#13;
we study the lower bound on the rejection probability (denoted by $extsc{rej}(epsilon)$) of the linearity test suggested by Blum, Luby and Rubinfeld. &#13;
This problem is arguably the most fundamental and extensively studied problem in property testing of Boolean functions. &#13;
&#13;
The previously best bounds for $extsc{rej}(epsilon)$ were obtained by Bellare,&#13;
Coppersmith, H{{a}}stad, Kiwi and Sudan. They used Fourier analysis&#13;
to show that $	extsc{rej}(epsilon) geq e$ for every $0 leq epsilon leq&#13;
frac{1}{2}$. They also conjectured that this bound might not be tight for&#13;
$epsilon$'s which are close to $1/2$. In this paper we show that this indeed is&#13;
the case. Specifically, we improve the lower bound of $	extsc{rej}(epsilon) geq&#13;
epsilon$ by an additive constant that depends only on $epsilon$:&#13;
$extsc{rej}(epsilon) geq epsilon + min {1376epsilon^{3}(1-2epsilon)^{12},&#13;
frac{1}{4}epsilon(1-2epsilon)^{4}}$,  for every $0 leq  epsilon leq frac{1}{2}$.&#13;
Our analysis is based on a relationship between $extsc{rej}(epsilon)$ and the&#13;
weight distribution of a coset of the Hadamard code. We use both Fourier&#13;
analysis and coding theory tools to estimate this weight distribution.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Tali Kaufman and Simon Litsyn and Ning Xie</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2008</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8341, Sublinear Algorithms (2008)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.08341.3</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-16971</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.08341.3</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
