<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-16T17:30:37Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="1737" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:1737</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:33:07Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Sound Lemma Generation for Proving Inductive Validity of Equations</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Aoto, Takahito</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Sound generalization</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>inductive theorem</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>automated theorem proving</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>term rewriting</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>In many automated methods for proving inductive theorems, finding a&#13;
suitable generalization of a conjecture is a key for the success of&#13;
proof attempts. On the other hand, an obtained generalized conjecture&#13;
may not be a theorem, and in this case hopeless proof attempts for the&#13;
incorrect conjecture are made, which is against the success and&#13;
efficiency of theorem proving.  Urso and Kounalis (2004) proposed a&#13;
generalization method for proving inductive validity of equations,&#13;
called sound generalization, that avoids such an over-generalization.&#13;
Their method guarantees that if the original conjecture is an&#13;
inductive theorem then so is the obtained generalization.  In this&#13;
paper, we revise and extend their method.  We restore a condition on&#13;
one of the characteristic argument positions imposed in their previous&#13;
paper and show that otherwise there exists a counterexample to their&#13;
main theorem.  We also relax a condition imposed in their framework&#13;
and add some flexibilities to some of other characteristic argument&#13;
positions so as to enlarge the scope of the technique.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Takahito Aoto</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2008</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 2, IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (2008)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2008.1737</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-17379</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2008.1737</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
