<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-21T03:13:38Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="17626" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:17626</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:00:09Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>The Step Complexity of Multidimensional Approximate Agreement</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Attiya, Hagit</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Ellen, Faith</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>approximate agreement</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>conflict detection</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>shared memory</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>wait-freedom</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>step complexity</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Approximate agreement allows a set of n processes to obtain outputs that are within a specified distance ε &gt; 0 of one another and within the convex hull of the inputs.&#13;
When the inputs are real numbers, there is a wait-free shared-memory approximate agreement algorithm [Moran, 1995] whose step complexity is in O(n log(S/ε)), where S, the spread of the inputs, is the maximal distance between inputs. There is another wait-free algorithm [Schenk, 1995] that avoids the dependence on n and achieves O(log(M/ε)) step complexity where M, the magnitude of the inputs, is the absolute value of the maximal input.&#13;
This paper considers whether it is possible to obtain an approximate agreement algorithm whose step complexity depends on neither n nor the magnitude of the inputs, which can be much larger than their spread. On the negative side, we prove that Ω(min{(log M)/(log log M), (√log n)/(log log n)}) is a lower bound on the step complexity of approximate agreement, even when the inputs are real numbers. On the positive side, we prove that a polylogarithmic dependence on n and S/ε can be achieved, by presenting an approximate agreement algorithm with O(log n (log n + log(S/ε))) step complexity. Our algorithm works for multidimensional domains. The step complexity can be further restricted to be in O(min{log n (log n + log (S/ε)), log(M/ε)}) when the inputs are real numbers.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Hagit Attiya and Faith Ellen</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2023</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 253, 26th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2022)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2022.6</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-176261</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2022.6</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
