<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-22T22:17:58Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="1767" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:1767</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:33:06Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>On Estimation Algorithms vs Approximation Algorithms</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Feige, Uriel</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Estimation Algorithms</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Approximation Algorithms</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Combinatorial Optimization</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>In a combinatorial optimization problem, when given an input&#13;
instance, one seeks a feasible solution that optimizes the value&#13;
of the objective function. Many combinatorial optimization&#13;
problems are NP-hard. A way of coping with NP-hardness is by&#13;
considering approximation algorithms. These algorithms run in&#13;
polynomial time,  and their performance is measured by their&#13;
approximation ratio: the worst case ratio between the value of the&#13;
solution produced and the value of the (unknown) optimal solution.&#13;
&#13;
In some cases the design of approximation algorithms includes a&#13;
nonconstructive component. As a result, the algorithms become&#13;
estimation algorithms rather than approximation algorithms: they&#13;
allow one to estimate the value of the optimal solution, without&#13;
actually producing a solution whose value is close to optimal.&#13;
&#13;
We shall present a few such examples, and discuss some open&#13;
questions.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Uriel Feige</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2008</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 2, IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (2008)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2008.1767</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-17676</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2008.1767</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
