2026-07-23T08:35:17Z https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai

oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:17975 2024-03-12T12:01:17Z ddc:004 open_access

Suffix-Prefix Queries on a Dictionary Loukides, Grigorios Pissis, Solon P. Thankachan, Sharma V. Zuba, Wiktor all-pairs suffix-prefix suffix-prefix queries internal pattern matching In the all-pairs suffix-prefix (APSP) problem, we are given a dictionary R of k strings, S_1,…,S_k, of total length n, and we are asked to find the length SPL_{i,j} of the longest string that is both a suffix of S_i and a prefix of S_j, for all i,j ∈ [1,k]. APSP is a classic problem in string algorithms with many applications in bioinformatics. When all strings of the dictionary are over an integer alphabet of size σ ≤ n^𝒪(1), APSP can be solved in the optimal 𝒪(n+k²) time with the use of the generalized suffix tree of the dictionary [Gusfield et al., Inf. Process. Lett. 1992]. In many bioinformatics applications, such as in sequence assembly, the size k of dictionary R is very large. In particular, k² usually dominates n, and thus the k² factor is the bottleneck both in the time and in the space complexity of such applications. We thus initiate a holistic study on several data structure variants of APSP. In particular, we consider the following types of queries: - One-to-One(i,j): output SPL_{i,j}. - One-to-All(i): output SPL_{i,j} for every j ∈ [1,k]. - Report(i,𝓁): output all distinct j ∈ [1,k] such that SPL_{i,j} ≥ 𝓁, where 𝓁 ≥ 0 is an integer. - Count(i,𝓁): output the number of distinct j ∈ [1,k] such that SPL_{i,j} ≥ 𝓁, where 𝓁 ≥ 0 is an integer. - Top(i,K): output K distinct j ∈ [1,k] with the highest values of SPL_{i,j} breaking ties arbitrarily. We assume the standard word RAM model of computation with word size w = Ω(log n) and an integer alphabet of size σ ≤ n^𝒪(1). We show the following upper bounds: Query | Space (words) | Query time | Note One-to-One(i,j) | 𝒪(n) | 𝒪(log log k) | Theorem 11 One-to-All(i) | 𝒪(n) | 𝒪(k) | Theorem 14 Report(i,𝓁) | 𝒪(n) | 𝒪(log n/log log n+output) | Theorem 19(i) Count(i,𝓁) | 𝒪(n) | 𝒪(log n/log log n) | Theorem 19(ii) Top(i,K) | 𝒪(n) | 𝒪(log² n/log log n+K) | Theorem 22 We also present efficient algorithms for constructing these data structures. Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik Grigorios Loukides and Solon P. Pissis and Sharma V. Thankachan and Wiktor Zuba 2023 Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 259, 34th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2023) InProceedings Text doc-type:ResearchArticle publishedVersion application/pdf doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2023.21 urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-179757 https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2023.21 eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode