2026-07-20T14:53:23Z https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai

oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:18059 2024-03-06T11:00:54Z ddc:004 open_access

On Range Summary Queries Afshani, Peyman Cheng, Pingan Basu Roy, Aniket Wei, Zhewei Computational Geometry Range Searching Random Sampling Geometric Approximation Data Structures and Algorithms We study the query version of the approximate heavy hitter and quantile problems. In the former problem, the input is a parameter ε and a set P of n points in ℝ^d where each point is assigned a color from a set C, and the goal is to build a structure such that given any geometric range γ, we can efficiently find a list of approximate heavy hitters in γ∩P, i.e., colors that appear at least ε |γ∩P| times in γ∩P, as well as their frequencies with an additive error of ε |γ∩P|. In the latter problem, each point is assigned a weight from a totally ordered universe and the query must output a sequence S of 1+1/ε weights such that the i-th weight in S has approximate rank iε|γ∩P|, meaning, rank iε|γ∩P| up to an additive error of ε|γ∩P|. Previously, optimal results were only known in 1D [Wei and Yi, 2011] but a few sub-optimal methods were available in higher dimensions [Peyman Afshani and Zhewei Wei, 2017; Pankaj K. Agarwal et al., 2012]. We study the problems for two important classes of geometric ranges: 3D halfspace and 3D dominance queries. It is known that many other important queries can be reduced to these two, e.g., 1D interval stabbing or interval containment, 2D three-sided queries, 2D circular as well as 2D k-nearest neighbors queries. We consider the real RAM model of computation where integer registers of size w bits, w = Θ(log n), are also available. For dominance queries, we show optimal solutions for both heavy hitter and quantile problems: using linear space, we can answer both queries in time O(log n + 1/ε). Note that as the output size is 1/ε, after investing the initial O(log n) searching time, our structure takes on average O(1) time to find a heavy hitter or a quantile! For more general halfspace heavy hitter queries, the same optimal query time can be achieved by increasing the space by an extra log_w(1/ε) (resp. log log_w(1/ε)) factor in 3D (resp. 2D). By spending extra log^O(1)(1/ε) factors in both time and space, we can also support quantile queries. We remark that it is hopeless to achieve a similar query bound for dimensions 4 or higher unless significant advances are made in the data structure side of theory of geometric approximations. Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik Peyman Afshani and Pingan Cheng and Aniket Basu Roy and Zhewei Wei 2023 Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 261, 50th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2023) InProceedings Text doc-type:ResearchArticle publishedVersion application/pdf doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2023.7 urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-180590 https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2023.7 eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode