<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-26T17:22:18Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="18301" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:18301</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:01:33Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Sum-Of-Squares Lower Bounds for the Minimum Circuit Size Problem</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Austrin, Per</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Risse, Kilian</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Proof Complexity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Sum of Squares</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Minimum Circuit Size Problem</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We prove lower bounds for the Minimum Circuit Size Problem (MCSP) in the Sum-of-Squares (SoS) proof system. Our main result is that for every Boolean function f: {0,1}ⁿ → {0,1}, SoS requires degree Ω(s^{1-ε}) to prove that f does not have circuits of size s (for any s &gt; poly(n)). As a corollary we obtain that there are no low degree SoS proofs of the statement NP ⊈ P/poly.&#13;
We also show that for any 0 &lt; α &lt; 1 there are Boolean functions with circuit complexity larger than 2^{n^α} but SoS requires size 2^{2^Ω(n^α)} to prove this. In addition we prove analogous results on the minimum monotone circuit size for monotone Boolean slice functions.&#13;
Our approach is quite general. Namely, we show that if a proof system Q has strong enough constraint satisfaction problem lower bounds that only depend on good expansion of the constraint-variable incidence graph and, furthermore, Q is expressive enough that variables can be substituted by local Boolean functions, then the MCSP problem is hard for Q.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Per Austrin and Kilian Risse</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2023</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 264, 38th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2023)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.31</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-183011</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.31</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
