<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-11T00:28:33Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="18735" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:18735</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:02:35Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>A Fine-Grained Classification of the Complexity of Evaluating the Tutte Polynomial on Integer Points Parameterized by Treewidth and Cutwidth</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Mannens, Isja</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Nederlof, Jesper</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Width Parameters</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Parameterized Complexity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Tutte Polynomial</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We give a fine-grained classification of evaluating the Tutte polynomial T(G;x,y) on all integer points on graphs with small treewidth and cutwidth. Specifically, we show for any point (x,y) ∈ ℤ² that either  &#13;
- T(G; x, y) can be computed in polynomial time, &#13;
- T(G; x, y) can be computed in 2^O(tw) n^O(1) time, but not in 2^o(ctw) n^O(1) time assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), &#13;
- T(G; x, y) can be computed in 2^O(tw log tw) n^O(1) time, but not in 2^o(ctw log ctw) n^O(1) time assuming the ETH,  where we assume tree decompositions of treewidth tw and cutwidth decompositions of cutwidth ctw are given as input along with the input graph on n vertices and point (x,y).&#13;
To obtain these results, we refine the existing reductions that were instrumental for the seminal dichotomy by Jaeger, Welsh and Vertigan [Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc'90]. One of our technical contributions is a new rank bound of a matrix that indicates whether the union of two forests is a forest itself, which we use to show that the number of forests of a graph can be counted in 2^O(tw) n^O(1) time.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Isja Mannens and Jesper Nederlof</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2023</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 274, 31st Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2023)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2023.82</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-187354</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2023.82</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
