<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-20T05:07:16Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="1897" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:1897</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:08:42Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Robust Normative Systems</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Agotnes, Thomas</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>van der Hoek, Wiebe</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Wooldridge, Michael</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Normative systems</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>robustness</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>fault tolerance</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>complexity</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Although normative systems, or social laws, have proved to be a&#13;
  highly influential approach to coordination in multi-agent systems,&#13;
  the issue of emph{compliance} to such normative systems remains&#13;
  problematic. In all real systems, it is possible that some members&#13;
  of an agent population will not comply with the rules of a normative&#13;
  system, even if it is in their interests to do so. It is therefore&#13;
  important to consider the extent to which a normative system is&#13;
  emph{robust}, i.e., the extent to which it remains effective even&#13;
  if some agents do not comply with it. We formalise and investigate&#13;
  three different notions of robustness and related decision problems.&#13;
  We begin by considering sets of agents whose compliance is necessary&#13;
  and/or sufficient to guarantee the effectiveness of a normative&#13;
  system; we then consider quantitative approaches to robustness,&#13;
  where we try to identify the proportion of an agent population that&#13;
  must comply in order to ensure success, and finally, we consider a&#13;
  more general approach, where we characterise the compliance&#13;
  conditions required for success as a logical formula.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Thomas Agotnes and Wiebe van der Hoek and Michael Wooldridge</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2009</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 9121, Normative Multi-Agent Systems (2009)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.09121.27</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-18971</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.09121.27</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
