<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-09-22T20:11:05Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="198" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:198</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-22T10:04:55Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Spiteful Bidding in Sealed-Bid Auctions</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Brandt, Felix</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Sandholm, Tuomas</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Shoham, Yoav</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Auctions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Externalities</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Spite</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Revenue</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We study the bidding behavior of spiteful agents who, contrary to&#13;
the common assumption of self-interest, maximize the weighted&#13;
difference of their own profit and their competitors' profit. This&#13;
assumption is motivated by inherent spitefulness, or, for example,&#13;
by competitive scenarios such as in closed markets where the loss of&#13;
a competitor will likely result in future gains for oneself. We&#13;
derive symmetric Bayes Nash equilibria for spiteful agents in&#13;
first-price and second-price sealed-bid auctions. In first-price&#13;
auctions, bidders become "more truthful" the more spiteful they&#13;
are. Surprisingly, the equilibrium strategy in second-price&#13;
auctions does not depend on the number of bidders. Based on these&#13;
equilibria, we compare revenue in both auction types. It turns out&#13;
that expected revenue in second-price auctions is higher than&#13;
expected revenue in first-price auctions whenever agents have the&#13;
slightest interest in reducing others' profit as long as they still&#13;
care for their own profit. In other words, revenue equivalence only&#13;
holds for auctions in which all agents are either self-interested or&#13;
completely malicious.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Felix Brandt and Tuomas Sandholm and Yoav Shoham</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2005</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 5011, Computing and Markets (2005)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.05011.17</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-1987</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.05011.17</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
