<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-08T04:31:27Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="20471" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:20471</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-07-26T08:47:22Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Invited Paper: Assessing Unchecked Factors for Certification: An Experimental Approach for GPU Cache Parameters</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Cazanove, Cédric</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Lesage, Benjamin</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Boniol, Frédéric</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Ermont, Jérôme</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>GPU</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>benchmarks</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>simulation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>certification</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>The certification objectives for airborne electronic hardware defined in AMC20-152A [EASA, 2021] and in AMC20-193 [EASA, 2020] capture some of the activities required for an applicant to embed a hardware platform in a safety-critical avionic system. For COTS (Commercially available Off-The-Shelf) platforms in particular, these objectives require applicants to identify functions, configuration settings, and resources present on the platform, and assess their use by the system. AMC20-152A however recognizes that documentation regarding the behavior of a COTS may be incomplete.&#13;
There is thus a strong push for applicants to the certification of a COTS to demonstrate their mastery of the platform, to highlight relevant factors (functions, settings, resources, etc.), and their use in their system. We outline in the following a standard approach to the exploration of unchecked factors of a platform, considering existing approaches in the literature, to build such a mastery. Our approach incrementally incorporates and validates knowledge of various factors by including them in micro-simulations compared to experimental ground truth.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Cédric Cazanove and Benjamin Lesage and Frédéric Boniol and Jérôme Ermont</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2024</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of OASIcs, Volume 121, 22nd International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2024)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2024.3</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-204719</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2024.3</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
