<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-01T15:00:39Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="20483" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:20483</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-08-20T13:53:45Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Consistent Ultrafinitist Logic</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Gajda, Michał J.</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>ultrafinitism</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>bounded Turing completeness</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>logic of computability</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>decidable logic</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>explicit complexity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>strict finitism</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Ultrafinitism postulates that we can only compute on relatively short objects, and numbers beyond a certain value are not available. This approach would also forbid many forms of infinitary reasoning and allow removing certain paradoxes stemming from enumeration theorems. For a computational application of ultrafinitist logic, we need more than a proof system, but a logical framework to express both proofs, programs, and theorems in a single framework. We present its inference rules, reduction relation, and self-encoding to allow direct proving of the properties of ultrafinitist logic within itself. We also provide a justification why it can express all bounded Turing programs, and thus serve as a "logic of computability".</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Michał J. Gajda</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2024</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 303, 29th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2023)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2023.5</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-204833</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2023.5</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
