<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-21T14:57:48Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="207" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:207</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:06:07Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Sequences of Take-It-or-Leave-It Offers: Near-Optimal Auctions Without Full Valuation Revelation</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Sandholm, Tuomas</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Gilpin, Andrew</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>compact representation of games</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>congestion games</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>local-effect games</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>action-graph gamescomputational markets; auctions; bidding strategiesNegotiatio</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We introduce take-it-or-leave-it auctions (TLAs) as an allocation&#13;
mechanism that allows buyers to retain much of their private valuation&#13;
information, yet generates close-to-optimal expected utility for the&#13;
seller. We show that if each buyer receives at most one offer, each&#13;
buyers dominant strategy is to act truthfully. In more general TLAs,&#13;
the buyers optimal strategies are more intricate, and we derive the&#13;
perfect Bayesian equilibrium for the game. We develop algorithms for&#13;
finding the equilibrium and also for optimizing the offers so as to&#13;
maximize the sellers expected utility. In several example settings we&#13;
show that the sellers expected utility already is close to optimal&#13;
for a small number of offers. As the number of buyers increases, the&#13;
sellers expected utility increases, and becomes increasingly (but not&#13;
monotonically) more competitive with Myersons expected utility&#13;
maximizing auction.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Tuomas Sandholm and Andrew Gilpin</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2005</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 5011, Computing and Markets (2005)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.05011.16</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-2075</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.05011.16</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
