<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-03T14:40:28Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="20810" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:20810</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-08-29T05:40:58Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Progress, Justness and Fairness in Modal μ-Calculus Formulae</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Spronck, Myrthe S. C.</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Luttik, Bas</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Willemse, Tim A. C.</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Modal μ-calculus</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Property specification</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Completeness criteria</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Progress</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Justness</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Fairness</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Liveness properties</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>When verifying liveness properties on a transition system, it is often necessary to discard spurious violating paths by making assumptions on which paths represent realistic executions. Capturing that some property holds under such an assumption in a logical formula is challenging and error-prone, particularly in the modal μ-calculus. In this paper, we present template formulae in the modal μ-calculus that can be instantiated to a broad range of liveness properties. We consider the following assumptions: progress, justness, weak fairness, strong fairness, and hyperfairness, each with respect to actions. The correctness of these formulae has been proven.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Myrthe S. C. Spronck and Bas Luttik and Tim A. C. Willemse</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2024</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 311, 35th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2024)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2024.38</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-208102</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2024.38</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
