<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-22T08:35:54Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="21024" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:21024</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-09-16T06:02:38Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>The Expander Hitting Property When the Sets Are Arbitrarily Unbalanced</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Ta-Shma, Amnon</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Zadicario, Ron</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Expander random walks</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Expander hitting property</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Numerous works have studied the probability that a length t-1 random walk on an expander is confined to a given rectangle S_1 × … × S_t, providing both upper and lower bounds for this probability. However, when the densities of the sets S_i may depend on the walk length (e.g., when all set are equal and the density is 1-1/t), the currently best known upper and lower bounds are very far from each other. We give an improved confinement lower bound that almost matches the upper bound.&#13;
We also study the more general question, of how well random walks fool various classes of test functions. Recently, Golowich and Vadhan proved that random walks on λ-expanders fool Boolean, symmetric functions up to a O(λ) error in total variation distance, with no dependence on the labeling bias. Our techniques extend this result to cases not covered by it, e.g., to functions testing confinement to S_1 × … × S_t, where each set S_i either has density ρ or 1-ρ, for arbitrary ρ.&#13;
Technique-wise, we extend Beck’s framework for analyzing what is often referred to as the "flow" of linear operators, reducing it to bounding the entries of a product of 2×2 matrices.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Amnon Ta-Shma and Ron Zadicario</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2024</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 317, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2024)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2024.31</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-210246</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2024.31</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
