<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-21T12:28:45Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="21039" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:21039</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-09-16T06:02:39Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Support Testing in the Huge Object Model</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Adar, Tomer</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Fischer, Eldar</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Levi, Amit</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Huge-Object model</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Property Testing</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>The Huge Object model is a distribution testing model in which we are given access to independent samples from an unknown distribution over the set of strings {0,1}ⁿ, but are only allowed to query a few bits from the samples. We investigate the problem of testing whether a distribution is supported on m elements in this model. It turns out that the behavior of this property is surprisingly intricate, especially when also considering the question of adaptivity.&#13;
We prove lower and upper bounds for both adaptive and non-adaptive algorithms in the one-sided and two-sided error regime. Our bounds are tight when m is fixed to a constant (and the distance parameter ε is the only variable). For the general case, our bounds are at most O(log m) apart. In particular, our results show a surprising O(log ε^{-1}) gap between the number of queries required for non-adaptive testing as compared to adaptive testing. For one-sided error testing, we also show that an O(log m) gap between the number of samples and the number of queries is necessary. Our results utilize a wide variety of combinatorial and probabilistic methods.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Tomer Adar and Eldar Fischer and Amit Levi</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2024</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 317, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2024)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2024.46</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-210399</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2024.46</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
