<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-07T04:28:12Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="21313" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:21313</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-10-28T09:51:05Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Improving the Crossing Lemma by Characterizing Dense 2-Planar and 3-Planar Graphs</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Büngener, Aaron</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Kaufmann, Michael</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Crossing Lemma</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>k-planar graphs</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>discharging method</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>The classical Crossing Lemma by Ajtai et al. and Leighton from 1982 gave an important lower bound of cm³/n² for the number of crossings in any drawing of a given graph of n vertices and m edges. The original value was c = 1/100, which then has gradually been improved. Here, the bounds for the density of k-planar graphs played a central role. Our new insight is that for k = 2,3 the k-planar graphs have substantially fewer edges if specific local configurations that occur in drawings of k-planar graphs of maximum density are forbidden. Therefore, we are able to derive better bounds for the crossing number cr(G) of a given graph G. In particular, we achieve a bound of cr(G) ≥ 73/18m-305/18(n-2) for the range of 5n &lt; m ≤ 6n, while our second bound cr(G) ≥ 5m - 407/18(n-2) is even stronger for larger m &gt; 6n.&#13;
For m &gt; 6.79n, we finally apply the standard probabilistic proof from the BOOK and obtain an improved constant of c &gt; 1/27.61 in the Crossing Lemma. Note that the previous constant was 1/29. Although this improvement is not too impressive, we consider our technique as an important new tool, which might be helpful in various other applications.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Aaron Büngener and Michael Kaufmann</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2024</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 320, 32nd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2024)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2024.29</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-213136</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2024.29</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
