<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-26T00:47:12Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="22634" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:22634</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-04-17T05:31:38Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Doubly Sub-Linear Interactive Proofs of Proximity</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Amir, Noga</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Goldreich, Oded</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Rothblum, Guy N.</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Interactive Proof Systems</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Interactive Proofs of Proximity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Query Complexity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Read Once Branching Programs</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Sub-linear</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We initiate a study of doubly-efficient interactive proofs of proximity, while focusing on properties that can be tested within query-complexity that is significantly sub-linear, and seeking interactive proofs of proximity in which  &#13;
1) The query-complexity of verification is significantly smaller than the query-complexity of testing. &#13;
2) The query-complexity of the honest prover strategy is not much larger than the query-complexity of testing.  We call such proof systems doubly-sublinear IPPs (dsIPPs).&#13;
We present a few doubly-sublinear IPPs. A salient feature of these IPPs is that the honest prover does not employ an optimal strategy (i.e. a strategy that maximizes the verifier’s acceptance probability). In particular, the honest prover in our IPP for sets recognizable by constant-width read-once oblivious branching programs uses a distance-approximator for such sets.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Noga Amir and Oded Goldreich and Guy N. Rothblum</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.6</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226345</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.6</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
